I agree with Zigner, it is Bali Hai who disagrees with you. He has ranted on this issue before and I tried to do what you are doing, provide facts to refute his argument(s). However, his mind is resolute. Facts change nothing. I even put the facts down as provided by the court specifically pointing out the multiple errors he makes--the answer is that that is only one side's facts. When pointed out some of the facts are agreed to by Chadwick (Bali's "good guy"), he says something about how Chadwick's attorney has an explanation for that.
You are merely one who has fallen into the spider's web of using facts or the law to argue with one pounding on the table.