Georgia and Wisconsin cases make for good reading, but not for precedent in Kentucky. The facts in the Kalb case is also somewhat dubious for the otherwise inebriated appellant WHO ADMITTED DRINKING THE BEERS!!!I think the court will accept the smell of residue as acceptable due to chemical nature of alcohol evaporation. However, they might not. What is the officer going to testify to? If he says it was there, his word will be accepted. Here is one such case where the empty bottle argument almost worked.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16667300099365420678&q=open+alcoholic+beverage+container+empty&hl=en&as_sdt=ffffffffffffe04
Here is another gem on the topic:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2294496751382489020&q=open+alcoholic+beverage+container+empty&hl=en&as_sdt=ffffffffffffe04
Last edited: