• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Tenant disputing additional charges after early termination of lease

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Flickan

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

I have been leasing my fathers house since his passing in September 2011. We were informed through a family friend of a family of four that were interested in renting the property, we were not seeking to rent out at the time. After meeting with the family we agreed to rent to them and they took possesion of the property in June 2012.

We normaly hear of some kind of "issue" from them at least once a month. From things like stray dogs entering the property to someone showing up at the gate, as well as some concerns they had like low water pressure and asking to have the septic tank emptied. Every issue was solved within the best of my ability and in a timely manner. I have documented all issues with dates. They seemed to be happy at the residence and it gave my sister and I a break to grieve before having to decide to sell the property.

Starting the beginning of July we were not hearing from them and rent started being on time ( it was usually late). We found out the begining of September through another mutual friend that they were planning to move out at the begining of the month. We contacted them and they denied it and said they were very upset that we thought they would skip out on us. They gave us their word that if indeed they would be moving we would be first to know. Fast forward two weeks and I stumbled on a post on one of the tenants facebook ( yes, good ol facebook, but I took a screenshot) that they would be moving to Arizona the following saturday September 28th. Tenany again denied it and was very angry at us for not believing him. He finally verbally admited on September 25th that they would be moving out as of the following Sunday.

I had just had my baby 5 weeks prior so I sent my husband (who was familier to then and regularly performed the property maintenance) up to do a quick walk through and to take pictures of things that he though would need to be repaired. The girlfriend was furious and accused my husband of intimidaiting her by walking around the house and taking pictures. We agreed to meet up do the final walk through on the Saturday. Suprise, they were gone when we got there. And then it got really fun.

The house was very dirty, they made no attempt to clean at all. The carpet was saturated with cat pee in every room the house, things like a sliding door handle were missing, the yard was overgrown with weeds, the grass dead and overgrown, and the pool was green with algae.

My husband and my sister (also co landlord) spent the next two weeks repaining and cleaning the carpet. The carpet had to be replaced as the pee had saturated down to the matting and there is no way we could rent it out, not to mention the million flea bites my sister recieved on her legs from cleaning the carpet ( pictures taken). Since no forwarding adress was given, I got his place of occupations address in Arizona and the address to her parents house and sent an itemized list for deductions. It was sent certified mail on October 18th. It was signed for in California (with Tenants name, although I dont think it was him) the following day.

I received a letter yesterday from their lawyer. They are requesting formal arbitration and saying they should not be held responsible for the deductions I made.

The deductions I made were:

Property damage: I only billed for the cost of things that needed to be replaced such as door hinges, sliding handle, and missing faucet knobs. Plus 2 hrs of work done by my husband. They say these are normal wear and tear?

Cleaning: They state the carpet ,floors, and walls were never cleaned prior to move it. It was. My brother in law owns a professional carpet cleaning buisness and performed the carpet cleaning and we repainted the walls prioer to them moving in. Plus they never once mentioned that it was not up to their standards. But The only cleaning I billed them for was the supplies like Urine Out and the time my sister spent trying to save the carpet.

New carpet: I requested them to pay half since the carpet was not new. However, cat pee saturation is not what I would consider "normal wear and tear" for a two year occupancy.

Propane: the tank was filled upon them moving in, as stated in the lease that they continually signed for 2 years and was supposed to be filled upon termination on lease, also stated in signed contract. They say it was not full.

Pool: I requested them to pay for the chemicals and time my husband spent bringing the pool back. They said that the pool was bad when they moved in. That I can not disagree 100 percent, however it was not nearly as bad as they left it and we wanted to hire a pool guy at their expense, but they requested to clean he pool themselves. I updated the addendum stating they "were responsible for pool and at any time they are unable to maintain it they were to advise the ladlords and a pool service would in fact be hired at their expense". Then after about a month of not maintaining the pool they tenant took it upon himself to drain the pool ( in the middle of July) and refill it with the propertys well water. I was angry when I found out but the pool was already half way emptied and tenant said he would accept all liabilty because I was worried about the pool cracking and stree on well pump ( I documented as well). We paid for his friends help and the pool was in great shape afterwards, as stated in a saved text from tenant.

Yard work: I charged him for the cost of yard work that was supposed to be mantained as stated in the signed addendum. They now say the grass was cut and the yard was overgrown upon move in. I have pictures proving the grass was dead and overgrown and the lawnmower (that we gave them because they had not been mowing) had spider webs on it. Trees , flowers and bushes were dead and had to be removed.

They are also complaining that they never received an iinitial inspecition report nor given time to remedy the identified deficiencies. - does that even apply with only four days notice of leaving and not even being present to return the keys?

They also say my Itemized Report was late because he did not receive it until the 22nd of October. It was signed for on the 19th of October.


If you managed to read through till the end thank you! I guess my question is do we go to Arbitration instead of court? I think I covered myself pretty well, but what am I forgetting to do? I have no idea what my next step is or who to seek for advise. All I want is money owed.

Thank you in advance
 


LdiJ

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

IThe house was very dirty, they made no attempt to clean at all. The carpet was saturated with cat pee in every room the house, things like a sliding door handle were missing, the yard was overgrown with weeds, the grass dead and overgrown, and the pool was green with algae.
You had the right to charge them for cleaning.

My husband and my sister (also co landlord) spent the next two weeks repaining and cleaning the carpet. The carpet had to be replaced as the pee had saturated down to the matting and there is no way we could rent it out, not to mention the million flea bites my sister recieved on her legs from cleaning the carpet ( pictures taken). Since no forwarding adress was given, I got his place of occupations address in Arizona and the address to her parents house and sent an itemized list for deductions. It was sent certified mail on October 18th. It was signed for in California (with Tenants name, although I dont think it was him) the following day.
Painting is iffy. You can only charge them for the depreciated value of the carpeting. Carpet depreciation varies from 5-7 years. If the carpeting is more than 5-7 years old you cannot charge them for it at all.

I received a letter yesterday from their lawyer. They are requesting formal arbitration and saying they should not be held responsible for the deductions I made.
How big was their deposit? Its not very cost effective to hire an attorney over security deposit issues.

The deductions I made were:

Property damage: I only billed for the cost of things that needed to be replaced such as door hinges, sliding handle, and missing faucet knobs. Plus 2 hrs of work done by my husband. They say these are normal wear and tear?
I wouldn't call any of that normal wear and tear.

Cleaning: They state the carpet ,floors, and walls were never cleaned prior to move it. It was. My brother in law owns a professional carpet cleaning buisness and performed the carpet cleaning and we repainted the walls prioer to them moving in. Plus they never once mentioned that it was not up to their standards. But The only cleaning I billed them for was the supplies like Urine Out and the time my sister spent trying to save the carpet.

New carpet: I requested them to pay half since the carpet was not new. However, cat pee saturation is not what I would consider "normal wear and tear" for a two year occupancy.
See above about the carpet.

Propane: the tank was filled upon them moving in, as stated in the lease that they continually signed for 2 years and was supposed to be filled upon termination on lease, also stated in signed contract. They say it was not full.
Ok

Pool: I requested them to pay for the chemicals and time my husband spent bringing the pool back. They said that the pool was bad when they moved in. That I can not disagree 100 percent, however it was not nearly as bad as they left it and we wanted to hire a pool guy at their expense, but they requested to clean he pool themselves. I updated the addendum stating they "were responsible for pool and at any time they are unable to maintain it they were to advise the ladlords and a pool service would in fact be hired at their expense". Then after about a month of not maintaining the pool they tenant took it upon himself to drain the pool ( in the middle of July) and refill it with the propertys well water. I was angry when I found out but the pool was already half way emptied and tenant said he would accept all liabilty because I was worried about the pool cracking and stree on well pump ( I documented as well). We paid for his friends help and the pool was in great shape afterwards, as stated in a saved text from tenant.
Kind of iffy

Yard work: I charged him for the cost of yard work that was supposed to be mantained as stated in the signed addendum. They now say the grass was cut and the yard was overgrown upon move in. I have pictures proving the grass was dead and overgrown and the lawnmower (that we gave them because they had not been mowing) had spider webs on it. Trees , flowers and bushes were dead and had to be removed.
Trees, flowers and bushes being dead can be iffy...sometimes those things die no matter how well you attempt to care for them.

They are also complaining that they never received an iinitial inspecition report nor given time to remedy the identified deficiencies. - does that even apply with only four days notice of leaving and not even being present to return the keys?

They also say my Itemized Report was late because he did not receive it until the 22nd of October. It was signed for on the 19th of October.
They aren't going to get anywhere with that stuff.


If you managed to read through till the end thank you! I guess my question is do we go to Arbitration instead of court? I think I covered myself pretty well, but what am I forgetting to do? I have no idea what my next step is or who to seek for advise. All I want is money owed.

Thank you in advance
Arbitration would likely be less expensive than court. I think that you are going to lose on some issues and win on some issues.
 

Flickan

Junior Member
You had the right to charge them for cleaning.



Painting is iffy. You can only charge them for the depreciated value of the carpeting. Carpet depreciation varies from 5-7 years. If the carpeting is more than 5-7 years old you cannot charge them for it at all.

How big was their deposit? Its not very cost effective to hire an attorney over security deposit issues.




I wouldn't call any of that normal wear and tear.



See above about the carpet.



Ok



Kind of iffy



Trees, flowers and bushes being dead can be iffy...sometimes those things die no matter how well you attempt to care for them.

.

They aren't going to get anywhere with that stuff.




Arbitration would likely be less expensive than court. I think that you are going to lose on some issues and win on some issues.


I didnt charge them for repainting, maybe you meant carpet? Carpet was old but they never gave notice of a cat and it is definately not okay that it saturated down through the padding and made the house reek of cat pee. Can they still be charged for cleaning and supplies? That total was only $150 for the cleaning.

Their deposit was only $1000. $750 of that I requested go towards loss of rent since they did not give 30 day notice with 3 months left in contract. We found another renter right away.

So they are required to refill propane tank since its stated in contract correct? That is additional $450.00

I wasnt charging for the trees, bushes and flowers themselves, just the clean up of the debris and weeds. $150.00 it was a lot of work


Thank you for your replys
 
Last edited:

Flickan

Junior Member
Is their lawyer registered to practice law in CA?
Their lawyer is in California. I dont really know why they would get a lawyer, the whole bill including the $1000.00 deposit was $2,700.

Although I am now questioning billing them for the carpet (it was seriously horrible). That would drop their bill down to them owing an additional $800 on top of their deposit. But perhaps I should let the arbitraitor decide that?

How do I respond to their letter?
 
Last edited:

BL

Senior Member
If the cat urine seeped all the way through the padding into to flooring you CAN bill for the associated expenses with that .

You are not required to respond .

Often time folks consult an attorney for a small fee and the attorney will write up a legal sounding letter to try and see where it flies.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
how many days after they terminated the tenancy did you send the notice regarding the deposit deductions? Given the date you realized they had left and the date you said the letter was received is cutting it close to the 21 days California gives for you to send the refund or a properly constructed notice of charges. Did you provide either actual costs supported by receipts or a good faith estimate as required by California law?

If it exceeded 21 days, you were not entitled to withhold anything. You would have to refund the entire amount and sue for the damages.

if you say anything about having to hunt for their address, the law says this:


The landlord must send the itemized statement, copies of invoices or receipts, and any good faith estimate to you at the address that you provide. If you do not provide an address, the landlord must send these documents to the address of the rental unit that you moved from
yes, if no forwarding address given, you send it to the place you know they no longer live. I didn't make the law, just passing it along.


to your withholding of any of the deposit for lost rent: you can only claim what you actually lost. You say you re-rented the place quickly. If the amount of the deposit you withheld for loss of rent exceed what you actually lost, you may be liable for a punitive damages claim in the amount of 3 times the amount improperly withheld due to "bad faith". The same punitive damages are possible for any amount you withheld due to "bad faith".

the carpet with cat pee: if beyond the time of depreciation (can't remember the specific period of time but it is about what ldiJ stated previously), you do not get to charge anything for it. If there were additional damages (such as it soaked into the underlayment) and you had to deal with that, those damages could be charged. If the carpet was less than the period allowed for depreciation, you only get to charge the share left in the time allowed. Example: if the period is 5 years and the carpet was 3 years old, you only get to charge 40% of the cost of the carpet (and that is not the replacement cost but the original cost)
 

justalayman

Senior Member
Property damage: I only billed for the cost of things that needed to be replaced such as door hinges, sliding handle, and missing faucet knobs. Plus 2 hrs of work done by my husband. They say these are normal wear and tear?
not wear and tear so they owe

Cleaning: They state the carpet ,floors, and walls were never cleaned prior to move it. It was. My brother in law owns a professional carpet cleaning buisness and performed the carpet cleaning and we repainted the walls prioer to them moving in. Plus they never once mentioned that it was not up to their standards. But The only cleaning I billed them for was the supplies like Urine Out and the time my sister spent trying to save the carpet.
you don't get to charge for cleaning the carpet and replacement. If you were speaking of cleaning carpet that you did not later replace; cleaning costs of a carpet are iffy, at best. Some dirt is considered normal wear and tear.


from:http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/sec-deposit.shtml

A landlord cannot routinely charge each tenant for cleaning carpets, drapes, walls, or windows in order to prepare the rental unit for the next tenancy.
2 years is the expected life of paint. You could not charge them anything for paint. If there was actual damage, you could charge for that though.

word of advice: anytime you have cat pee, replace the carpet and pad asap

New carpet: I requested them to pay half since the carpet was not new. However, cat pee saturation is not what I would consider "normal wear and tear" for a two year occupancy.
age of the carpet is critical here. There is no real standard life though. It depends on the carpet itself. If it is really cheap, probably 5 years or so is reasonable. If it is really good carpet, 10 years or so is reasonable. You get to charge for the loss of life of the carpet. If a 10 year rated carpet was 5 years old, you can charge 1/2 of the replacment cost (my mistake previously regarding original cost) of a carpet of the same type and quality. If it was 9 years old, you charge 10%. If a 5 year carpet and it was 5 years old, you charge nothing. If 2 1/2 years old, you charge half.

Propane: the tank was filled upon them moving in, as stated in the lease that they continually signed for 2 years and was supposed to be filled upon termination on lease, also stated in signed contract. They say it was not full.
if it states it must be filled upon leaving, then it has to be filled upon leaving. A valid charge.

Pool: I requested them to pay for the chemicals and time my husband spent bringing the pool back.
not likely to fly.
They said that the pool was bad when they moved in. That I can not disagree 100 percent, however it was not nearly as bad as they left it and we wanted to hire a pool guy at their expense, but they requested to clean he pool themselves
.so it was not good when they moved in yet you want to charge to bring it up to "good" condition on their dime? I don't think so.


.

Yard work: I charged him for the cost of yard work that was supposed to be mantained as stated in the signed addendum. They now say the grass was cut and the yard was overgrown upon move in. I have pictures proving the grass was dead and overgrown and the lawnmower (that we gave them because they had not been mowing) had spider webs on it. Trees , flowers and bushes were dead and had to be removed.
a tough call. I would suggest not charging for such things usually.

They are also complaining that they never received an iinitial inspecition report nor given time to remedy the identified deficiencies. - does that even apply with only four days notice of leaving and not even being present to return the keys?
they had all the time they allowed to remedy the issues. Since they left in a hurry, the lack of time was of their own doing. You do not have to allow them to come back to do the work.
 

Flickan

Junior Member
how many days after they terminated the tenancy did you send the notice regarding the deposit deductions? Given the date you realized they had left and the date you said the letter was received is cutting it close to the 21 days California gives for you to send the refund or a properly constructed notice of charges. Did you provide either actual costs supported by receipts or a good faith estimate as required by California law?

If it exceeded 21 days, you were not entitled to withhold anything. You would have to refund the entire amount and sue for the damages.

if you say anything about having to hunt for their address, the law says this:


yes, if no forwarding address given, you send it to the place you know they no longer live. I didn't make the law, just passing it along.


to your withholding of any of the deposit for lost rent: you can only claim what you actually lost. You say you re-rented the place quickly. If the amount of the deposit you withheld for loss of rent exceed what you actually lost, you may be liable for a punitive damages claim in the amount of 3 times the amount improperly withheld due to "bad faith". The same punitive damages are possible for any amount you withheld due to "bad faith".

the carpet with cat pee: if beyond the time of depreciation (can't remember the specific period of time but it is about what ldiJ stated previously), you do not get to charge anything for it. If there were additional damages (such as it soaked into the underlayment) and you had to deal with that, those damages could be charged. If the carpet was less than the period allowed for depreciation, you only get to charge the share left in the time allowed. Example: if the period is 5 years and the carpet was 3 years old, you only get to charge 40% of the cost of the carpet (and that is not the replacement cost but the original cost)
I sent the letter certified at 20 days. It was received and signed for on the 21st day. Yes I cut it close :/

I provided copies of all receipts with the itemized deduction form.

I had an address that they had asked me to send mail to before and I sent it there, as well as his place of employment as stated on his public Facebook page.

The carpet is about 10 yrs old I am sure. There are no receipts and No one to ask.... The cat pee soaked through to the bottom floring and we had to paint it with kilz before laying the new carpet.
 

Flickan

Junior Member
how many days after they terminated the tenancy did you send the notice regarding the deposit deductions? Given the date you realized they had left and the date you said the letter was received is cutting it close to the 21 days California gives for you to send the refund or a properly constructed notice of charges. Did you provide either actual costs supported by receipts or a good faith estimate as required by California law?

If it exceeded 21 days, you were not entitled to withhold anything. You would have to refund the entire amount and sue for the damages.

if you say anything about having to hunt for their address, the law says this:


yes, if no forwarding address given, you send it to the place you know they no longer live. I didn't make the law, just passing it along.


to your withholding of any of the deposit for lost rent: you can only claim what you actually lost. You say you re-rented the place quickly. If the amount of the deposit you withheld for loss of rent exceed what you actually lost, you may be liable for a punitive damages claim in the amount of 3 times the amount improperly withheld due to "bad faith". The same punitive damages are possible for any amount you withheld due to "bad faith".

the carpet with cat pee: if beyond the time of depreciation (can't remember the specific period of time but it is about what ldiJ stated previously), you do not get to charge anything for it. If there were additional damages (such as it soaked into the underlayment) and you had to deal with that, those damages could be charged. If the carpet was less than the period allowed for depreciation, you only get to charge the share left in the time allowed. Example: if the period is 5 years and the carpet was 3 years old, you only get to charge 40% of the cost of the carpet (and that is not the replacement cost but the original cost)
Sorry forgot to say...

I only withheld for the cost of lost rent for three weeks. That is how long it took for us to clean up and have the new tenant move in.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
Flickan;3222042]I sent the letter certified at 20 days. It was received and signed for on the 21st day. Yes I cut it close :/
dang close. How are they arguing it had been over the allowed time?



The carpet is about 10 yrs old I am sure. There are no receipts and No one to ask....
I wouldn't bet on being given any value to the carpet given it's age. If it is determined to be fully depreciated, you don't get to charge for the carpet (or pad) but the floor treatment is additional and a valid charge. as for no receipts; by examination by a carpet supplier, the type and quality would have been able to be determined to some reasonable extent. You would use that info to determine cost to replace. It would also give you a rough estimate of expected life so you knew what portion of the life you lost which is what you must base your claim for damages on.


You have to support your claim if they object to it. If you cannot support the charges, you will likely lose (at least that part of the claim) in arbitration or court.





The cat pee soaked through to the bottom floring and we had to paint it with kilz before laying the new carpet.
and? how would you rate the results? Through some research (as I am dealing with a cat issue myself) I have read Zinsser B I N clear sealer should out perform Kilz for the purpose. I sure hope it works since I will be testing it out in the next couple of weeks.:eek:
 

Flickan

Junior Member
not wear and tear so they owe

you don't get to charge for cleaning the carpet and replacement. If you were speaking of cleaning carpet that you did not later replace; cleaning costs of a carpet are iffy, at best. Some dirt is considered normal wear and tear.


from:http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/sec-deposit.shtml



2 years is the expected life of paint. You could not charge them anything for paint. If there was actual damage, you could charge for that though.

word of advice: anytime you have cat pee, replace the carpet and pad asap

age of the carpet is critical here. There is no real standard life though. It depends on the carpet itself. If it is really cheap, probably 5 years or so is reasonable. If it is really good carpet, 10 years or so is reasonable. You get to charge for the loss of life of the carpet. If a 10 year rated carpet was 5 years old, you can charge 1/2 of the replacment cost (my mistake previously regarding original cost) of a carpet of the same type and quality. If it was 9 years old, you charge 10%. If a 5 year carpet and it was 5 years old, you charge nothing. If 2 1/2 years old, you charge half.

if it states it must be filled upon leaving, then it has to be filled upon leaving. A valid charge.

not likely to fly. .so it was not good when they moved in yet you want to charge to bring it up to "good" condition on their dime? I don't think so.


.

a tough call. I would suggest not charging for such things usually.

they had all the time they allowed to remedy the issues. Since they left in a hurry, the lack of time was of their own doing. You do not have to allow them to come back to do the work.
I thought that I already reponded to this post but didnt my response, so please forgive me if I am repeating myself.

I was not charging for normal dirt. I am charging for the need to repeatedly clean the carpets with urine remover and a carpet cleaner trying to remove the urine and smell. I see that I will most likely not be able to charge for the replacement carpet, but I will still try for the cleaning and supplies.

I didnt charge for paint.

The pool was topped off with well water prior to their move in .A water test showed that the pool had an above normal amout of iron in it and we were in the process of elimintaing it. It needed one more treatment (the water was cloudy) . We wanted to hire a pool service as originally stated in the contract but the tenant asked to maintain it himself. I occasionlly took a water sample for testing (I have all dated reports) and they all showed the water was great so after a couple of months I stopped taking samples. I figured he knew what he was doing. It is stated in the contract that at anytime the pool could not be maintained we should be notified immediately and a poop service would be hired. It was completely green when they vacated.


I added an addendum when they moved in that said that they were to maintain the yard to fire safety standards ,especially since the property is county. Everything was on drippers, most automatic , one that needed to be turned on manually. You could see where some drippers had been chewed by a dog and did not reach the tree or bush that died. Everything was overgrown and grass completely dead because they never mowed and the sprinklers could not properly water.
 

Flickan

Junior Member
dang close. How are they arguing it had been over the allowed time?



I wouldn't bet on being given any value to the carpet given it's age. If it is determined to be fully depreciated, you don't get to charge for the carpet (or pad) but the floor treatment is additional and a valid charge. as for no receipts; by examination by a carpet supplier, the type and quality would have been able to be determined to some reasonable extent. You would use that info to determine cost to replace. It would also give you a rough estimate of expected life so you knew what portion of the life you lost which is what you must base your claim for damages on.


You have to support your claim if they object to it. If you cannot support the charges, you will likely lose (at least that part of the claim) in arbitration or court.





and? how would you rate the results? Through some research (as I am dealing with a cat issue myself) I have read Zinsser B I N clear sealer should out perform Kilz for the purpose. I sure hope it works since I will be testing it out in the next couple of weeks.:eek:

They are trying to say they moved out on the 25th when my husband went up to take pictures. However we had agreed on a final walk through for the following saturday ( through saved texts) , but they were not there, only leaving a note with the keys saying they had other engagements.

I have pretty good documentations for eveything I charged them for. Or at least I "think" I do. I am new at this and just doing the best I can. I have notes throught there whole tenancy for every occurance with dates. And lots of pictures :)

And I gave the wrong information... we used the BIN Zissner. I had asked my husband to get the Kilz but he got wrong. A good mistake on his part I guess. It worked pretty well. If you stick your nose way down in the carpet in the worst saturated corner you can get a light wiff, but you would have to be looking for it. NOTHING like it was. I didnt even want my newborn in the house the smell was so strong :(
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top