Legallette
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California
My fiancee unfortunately has a history of DUI convictions and was incarcerated in state prison for 8 months following his fourth DUI. Last Saturday early morning, he had some sort of mental breakdown and was pulled over while speeding on the interstate. He told the officer cops had raided his house and killed his dog, and that he was on his way to Las Vegas to marry me. He was barefoot and only wearing boxer shorts. Clearly not in his right mind. Someone from either CHP or the jail facility called his dad to ask if he had mental problems/mental illness, which he does not have any history of. Apparently, he just snapped that morning. They told his dad that he was NOT drunk. So, they have charged him with two offenses: VC 23153(a) and VC 23550.5(a). I understand the second charge, IF he was indeed intoxicated, however the officer stressed that he wasn't. But the first charge relates to driving under the influence and causing an injury accident. There was no accident, no injury to anyone, in fact the car doesn't have a scratch on it. How could these charges possibly hold up in court? His arraignment is on Wednesday.
My fiancee unfortunately has a history of DUI convictions and was incarcerated in state prison for 8 months following his fourth DUI. Last Saturday early morning, he had some sort of mental breakdown and was pulled over while speeding on the interstate. He told the officer cops had raided his house and killed his dog, and that he was on his way to Las Vegas to marry me. He was barefoot and only wearing boxer shorts. Clearly not in his right mind. Someone from either CHP or the jail facility called his dad to ask if he had mental problems/mental illness, which he does not have any history of. Apparently, he just snapped that morning. They told his dad that he was NOT drunk. So, they have charged him with two offenses: VC 23153(a) and VC 23550.5(a). I understand the second charge, IF he was indeed intoxicated, however the officer stressed that he wasn't. But the first charge relates to driving under the influence and causing an injury accident. There was no accident, no injury to anyone, in fact the car doesn't have a scratch on it. How could these charges possibly hold up in court? His arraignment is on Wednesday.