What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? New York
At the end of October 2011 I left my college on psychiatric medical leave. Under those conditions I renounced credit from the semester so far in order to receive a tuition refund. Unfortunately, I found that in my senior year, I was awarded no gift aid in the Spring semester. The school is very expensive, and the amount of aid I receive per year is substantial (upwards of $40,000/year). As of now my father is dissolving the entire contents of his 401K to pay those extra $20,000, since my parents are unable to pay for any percentage of my tuition. Otherwise I'd be forced into leaving the college with no degree but 7 semesters of credit. For the record, I've been a very good student despite my mental health, and expect to graduate with a 3.4 GPA.
A college financial aid officer told me that the college awards gift aid based on attempted credits, although there is no mention of this in the student handbook or SLC website, or any other material available to students, although these people have insisted it is and always has been available. When I left college, my life was endangered by my illness. I had no choice but to leave, or risk jeopardizing my physical presence on Earth.
While I understand that the gift aid policy is in place for a reason, it ignore the needs of ill and disabled students. I question the legality of this decision, particularly as, since I noted before, this policy was NOT, in ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, made known to me at the time I matriculated in 2009, or the time I was forced to leave in 2011. Neither I nor my father (the parent involved with the financial side of things) have any paper or email records of that info, although again the school insists I'm incorrect.
The unfairness of this act is unquestionable. The legality of it is tenuous; while I have yet to find information within the ADA-Title III specifically regarding gift aid, the structure of the law suggests the college's actions are on shaky legal ground. Further, at an institution which excuses its high cost on the basis of its ability to help individual students, the treatment I've received so far is perplexing.
At the end of October 2011 I left my college on psychiatric medical leave. Under those conditions I renounced credit from the semester so far in order to receive a tuition refund. Unfortunately, I found that in my senior year, I was awarded no gift aid in the Spring semester. The school is very expensive, and the amount of aid I receive per year is substantial (upwards of $40,000/year). As of now my father is dissolving the entire contents of his 401K to pay those extra $20,000, since my parents are unable to pay for any percentage of my tuition. Otherwise I'd be forced into leaving the college with no degree but 7 semesters of credit. For the record, I've been a very good student despite my mental health, and expect to graduate with a 3.4 GPA.
A college financial aid officer told me that the college awards gift aid based on attempted credits, although there is no mention of this in the student handbook or SLC website, or any other material available to students, although these people have insisted it is and always has been available. When I left college, my life was endangered by my illness. I had no choice but to leave, or risk jeopardizing my physical presence on Earth.
While I understand that the gift aid policy is in place for a reason, it ignore the needs of ill and disabled students. I question the legality of this decision, particularly as, since I noted before, this policy was NOT, in ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, made known to me at the time I matriculated in 2009, or the time I was forced to leave in 2011. Neither I nor my father (the parent involved with the financial side of things) have any paper or email records of that info, although again the school insists I'm incorrect.
The unfairness of this act is unquestionable. The legality of it is tenuous; while I have yet to find information within the ADA-Title III specifically regarding gift aid, the structure of the law suggests the college's actions are on shaky legal ground. Further, at an institution which excuses its high cost on the basis of its ability to help individual students, the treatment I've received so far is perplexing.