So let me get this straight: I can call up the cops and say I think I saw Zigner driving drunk one night. Not a single other person sees Zigner and not a single LEO sees Zigner either. Just a single phone call from a "witness". You all are saying that gives LEO permission to enter Zigners home and perform a search upon his person sans warrant, despite there not being a single ground for probable cause on the basis of the officers observations, and somehow its legal? Nothing about that sits right with me.
The officers saw zero. Even the very act of OP scraping a curb (which I myself have done before but completely sober) isn't by itself an indicator of OP being intoxicated. The very fact that he was also at home and therefor no longer a danger to others should have removed the ability for officers to perform a search (sobriety test) because technically OP was not in the act of committing a crime that would have given the officers permission or even reasonable doubt to search him. Even refusing the blood test was well within his rights as again, when the officers showed up to OPs home he was not in the process of committing a crime and they had no other proof OP committed a crime other than the statement of a single "witness". Zigner if I called LEO and told them you were drunk (even if you hadn't even left your home for the night) would you let them in and give them your blood all based on some random person statement? I get that OP was out n about, but that wasn't something the officers observed. For all they knew, OP had been home for hours. Did the "witness" actually identify OP or did they simply give a license plate and officers traced that back to OPs home? Again, proof of OP committing a crime would be where? Even evidence on the vehicle might not mean much because without the ability to know whether OP was even the one driving it, the "evidence" just becomes scuff on a vehicle.
And running purely on OPs statement, there was no damage to property, nobody was hurt, OP said he scraped a curb. I'm still wondering how a curb scrape with no damage to person or property and OP already home is cause for LEO to seek him out and perform a search. Unless of course OP is making the whole thing up and the damage was actually far far worse than we're being told. If that isn't the case, then this whole thing is nonsense.