Driver100WM
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Maryland
I had 3 fillings on one side of my mouth. The bite turned out to be uneven, and caused sensitivity. So I went back to the dentist to get the filling resurfaced. It's feeling more even, and sensitivity seemed to have stopped, but it returned about 1 week after resurfacing. The dentist had two chances to work on my tooth, and both times problem emerged. I understand that malpractice claim can be difficult and time consuming, but in your opinion, do I have a damage? I think most will say No.
I didn't pay to get sensitive tooth, and it will cost me more money to go to another dentist can filling re-done which is certainly financial damage costing me time and money. Plus insurance may not pay for the same filling. The dentist did bill my insurance for resurfacing the filling so if I were to ask the dentist to re-do the filling, another claim will be sent to my insurance which may get denied for being same filling so I'm in a bit of bind.
What do you think? Will the best course of action be to go back to the same dentist and run the risk of paying for re-filling out of pocket even though previous 2 times ended up with problem? If I were to pay for re-filling out of my pocket, I would rather pay another dentist.
Another option that I'm considering is, insurance may pay for same filling when the new policy period begins in January 2016, so should I just wait until then to go to another dentist? I know that there can be a health risk to myself for waiting until then because I don't know what's causing the sensitivity? Hopefully when the dentist resurfaced the filling, too much was grinded.
I had 3 fillings on one side of my mouth. The bite turned out to be uneven, and caused sensitivity. So I went back to the dentist to get the filling resurfaced. It's feeling more even, and sensitivity seemed to have stopped, but it returned about 1 week after resurfacing. The dentist had two chances to work on my tooth, and both times problem emerged. I understand that malpractice claim can be difficult and time consuming, but in your opinion, do I have a damage? I think most will say No.
I didn't pay to get sensitive tooth, and it will cost me more money to go to another dentist can filling re-done which is certainly financial damage costing me time and money. Plus insurance may not pay for the same filling. The dentist did bill my insurance for resurfacing the filling so if I were to ask the dentist to re-do the filling, another claim will be sent to my insurance which may get denied for being same filling so I'm in a bit of bind.
What do you think? Will the best course of action be to go back to the same dentist and run the risk of paying for re-filling out of pocket even though previous 2 times ended up with problem? If I were to pay for re-filling out of my pocket, I would rather pay another dentist.
Another option that I'm considering is, insurance may pay for same filling when the new policy period begins in January 2016, so should I just wait until then to go to another dentist? I know that there can be a health risk to myself for waiting until then because I don't know what's causing the sensitivity? Hopefully when the dentist resurfaced the filling, too much was grinded.
Last edited: