Obviously you know zilch about the conditional rights of a Florida married couple to claim as exempt from execution, real and personal property, held in estates by the entirety, or judgment lien laws, or how the different bankruptcy courts in Florida treat the subject. The result being that you have posted nothing but your usual sophisms.
In the first place the act of perfecting a judgment lien DOES NOT require the judgment to "find the land" (that is, physically locate and identify it as you have irresponsibly stated.) Not in Florida or any other state. And your state of Indiana not excepted. (See: F. S. Section 55.10 Judgments, orders, and decrees; lien of all, generally; extension of liens; etc.)
Secondly, in Florida property held in an estate by the entirety is exempt from execution unless the spouses are found to be jointly liable for the underlying indebtedness. Sitomer v. Orlan, 660 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
Which, interestingly, is also true in YOUR VERY OWN STATE OF INDIANA! See: Ind. Code § 34-55-10-2(C)(5); see also Diss v. Agri Bus. Int’l, 670 N.E.2d 97, 99 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996) (“A tenancy by the entirety is immune from seizure)
Thirdly, your misinformed, equivocal guesswork that should the OP seek creditors relief under the bankruptcy code that the trustee could seize the land for the benefit of unsecured creditors is in stark contrast with the case of Mitchel vs. Brook, Trustee US Bankruptcy Court Middle District Florida Tampa Division Case No. 8:04 bk-11064 PMG as follows:
"If the Debtor and her husband acquired their interest in the Property as tenants by the entireties, then the Debtor's interest may be exempt from her Chapter 7 estate pursuant to §522(b)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, and the Trustee may not be authorized to sell the property pursuant to §363(h)."