What needs to be "proven" is your friend's sanity! And to ask yourself, "Would I do the same stupid thing"? If so, then you are both nut cases.What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? AZ
My friend wants to add my name into his title deed, do we have to prove our relationship or something else?
Yes, there is still a mortgage of this but both of us are agree. Any problem then if my friend or me quitclaim deed?Is there a mortgage of the property?
The bank may care and would likely be within their rights to call the loan.Yes, there is still a mortgage of this but both of us are agree. Any problem then if my friend or me quitclaim deed?
Should the owner deed you an ownership interest in the home, that in itself would not render you personally liable on the mortgage or any other outstanding liens against the property. Not unless you contracted in writing with friend to assume some responsibility for those liens and they were clearly specified.Yes, there is still a mortgage of this but both of us are agree. Any problem then if my friend or me quitclaim deed?
Listen, Aardvark. You just keep your nose busy in those termite mounds!But, but, but.... We're so in love!
All you grumpy and negative people (especially that latigo) ...
Because the problem of us is that he owns me and couldn't pay, so he wants to add my name to deed, after a while time, if he still couldn't pay, he will quitclaim deed, also if he can pay, I will quitclaim.Should the owner deed you an ownership interest in the home, that in itself would not render you personally liable on the mortgage or any other outstanding liens against the property. Not unless you contracted in writing with friend to assume some responsibility for those liens and they were clearly specified.
In which case, (theoretically speaking) those lien holders (mortgagee) would have status as third party beneficiaries and hold you financially responsible to the extent of your assumption.
Also the laws of cotenancy are such that each co-tenant or co-owner is responsible for their share of the expenses of maintaining the property in proportion to their percentage of ownership, including mortgage payments, ad valorem taxes, insurance, normal maintenance, etc.
Which means that if you acquired some ownership, but did not agree to assume any portion of the outstanding indebtedness against the property, the other co-owner - upon pay those obligations could seek contribution from you for your proportion share. Plus, hold you financial responsible for the costs of maintaining the property (taxes, insurance, upkeep etc.) to the extent of your percentage of ownership.
As I see your situation, the only reason you would allow the friend to grant you part of that home is out of selfishness. Because it would be a tremendous disservice to him! Whether he realizes it or not, he eventually will regret it. And that is a promise!
(You mean that he bought you and hasn't paid for the merchandise?)Because the problem of us is that he owns me and couldn't pay, so he wants to add my name to deed, after a while time, if he still couldn't pay, he will quitclaim deed, also if he can pay, I will quitclaim.
(You mean that he bought you and hasn't paid for the merchandise?)
Seriously though, if he needs you to help him pay the expenses of keeping the home, rather that doing a quitclaim why couldn't you simply loan him the money and take a promissory note or some other writing whereby he agrees to reimburse you.
Obviously I was wrong earlier and apologize as it now appears that this proposed arrangement is more for his benefit than yours. But just keep in mind that if you go on the title to the property he can legally require you to pay a proportion of those expenses. But if you stay off of the title and loan him the money he can't.
Good luck and don't bake down there in sunny triple digit Arizona