PC 496D (a) Charge

[whowelookinfor]

I believe the word you were looking for earlier was "turpitude" (which means vileness or baseness and it is not something that should be displayed to others) instead of "turpute" (which I do not think means anything, at least in English*).

It is always good to expand your vocabulary by trying out new words. It is best if you know how to spell them and what they mean first, though.



*Norwegian for pillow - thanks, justalayman (but not for your description of it prior to providing the definition )

yep, good advice-but I am no wise man. just a fool with no arguable defense! a know it all whom couldn't just allow the world to think me a fool. I remove doubt often.

last play on words for the thread....okay, the post: smartphone=dumb ass spell correction is not always so effective with spelling,but I love how it's grammar is GOOD

ididnt have any business usingthe phrase moral turpentine, honestly-knew it, but my ignorance, while bliss, is no excuse for the Law and although obscure-helped my point, subliminally.

how funny-battery power low on my dumb wireless keyboard, too. ALL OF MY TECHNOLOGY JUST MAKES MY SEEM UNEDUCATED AND FULL-OF-IT, IT'S NOT ME!

 

[whowelookinfor]

I believe you meant turpitude. Turpute is norwegian for pillow.


so anybody that thought I was referring to something else raise their hands



shame on you.

I gotta ask, no disrespect intended, but, I am wondering if you used google too obtain such an appropriate bit of trivial information as far as pillow talk goes, anyway-or are you familiar with the language? I finally had to change viewing this thread on my phone to my pc-i'm having trouble knowing what comments were made in their correct order-my responses are so scattered...but I was informed of the defined meaning of turpitude in another post, which is when I realized my typing was not correct in its spelling I was about to google my word myself....but showed little self control.

and hahaha...if I raise my hands...i'll drop my towel, duh.

 

[Just Blue]

the only words posted for this thread in this past in 6 month my own, I posted those words yesterday.
yet I did not get to read the any comments of advice for this original post. WT(edited for content)? why was my post removed?

Likely due to content or because you started posting to a dead thread. If you bothered to read the TOS filthy language is not allowed...Even in acronyms.

 

[justalayman]

I, too, know of ONE attorney in which would keep his position and obligation as a priority to uphold his character....
and he isn't making much by way of income, on a relative scale.

You missed the point. A lawyer cannot suborn perjury so you don't ask if they're guilty
The lawyer I spoke of does just fine.

 

[justalayman]

*Norwegian for pillow - thanks, justalayman (but not for your description of it prior to providing the definition )

I can't help it if your mind went there. Read my stuff again knowing its a pillow. Not a vulgar statement in the bunch. It isn't even suggestive of anything risqué. Nope. I have s very nice pillow. It's a serts memory foam pillow and everything I said about it is an accurate statement. It was too firm when new but it has softened up as it has been used a bit. Everybody loves my pillow. It's really is a great pillow.


Shame on you Quincy, shame.


I thought you thought better of me.

 

[justalayman]

I gotta ask, no disrespect intended, but, I am wondering if you used google too obtain such an appropriate bit of trivial information as far as pillow talk goes, anyway-or are you familiar with the language? I finally had to change viewing this thread on my phone to my pc-i'm .

definately a Google find. Just took advantage of the error and had some fun.

 

[justalayman]

this is so true. however, those are words better suited for for Mike Tyson, Bill Clinton, or Tina Harding. (OMG, I am a little behind on my current news drama!)
our words are all great in theory....but only thing that matters if you are the subject of a case filed in SBCSC is how to get the case investigated. better open that pie hole.

Well, there was a double homicide a few miles from me. They caught the guy but the only reason he was convicted was he didn't keep his mouth shut. Good ol' jailhouse confession. He talked about it to fellow inmate. (He had been arrested for something totally unrelated)

dang, when I was robbed long long ago, the only reason the guys were caught was because one of them, who was being questioned about a totally unrelated crime. Admittedly to robbing me. The cop interrogating him simply said (with no reason to believe what he was asking about); I heard you were involved in the [place I worked at the time] robbery. Kid paused for a moment, hung his head, and said: ya, I was. Then he ratted out his friends.

I saw the kid at a trial. I was about 15 feet away. No way could I identify the kid. The ONLY reason he was caught and convicted was because he opened his mouth.


If you commit a crime you simply so not go blabbing to anybody about it.

 

[Just Blue]

I can't help it if your mind went there. Read my stuff again knowing its a pillow. Not a vulgar statement in the bunch. It isn't even suggestive of anything risqué. Nope. I have s very nice pillow. It's a serts memory foam pillow and everything I said about it is an accurate statement. It was too firm when new but it has softened up as it has been used a bit. Everybody loves my pillow. It's really is a great pillow.


Shame on you Quincy, shame.


I thought you thought better of me.

Our minds "went" EXACTLY where you knew they would...

I will say I was blushing while reading those posts...

 

[quincy]

... I thought you thought better of me.

Nope. Not really.

 

[whowelookinfor]

definately a Google find. Just took advantage of the error and had some fun.

Thank you, for the reply....much a appreciated, and very well put, BTW. No shame.

We hear what we want and listen according to those ideas, though. It's the beauty of the language. (English, of course...)

 

[whowelookinfor]

You missed the point. A lawyer cannot suborn perjury so you don't ask if they're guilty
The lawyer I spoke of does just fine.

As does the lawyer I know, just isn't much of a big shot.

 

[HighwayMan]

... or Tina Harding...

Who the hell is Tina Harding? What did I miss now?

 

[Ohiogal]

First of all, I shouldn't have to remind any senior member to pay attention to word chosen when attempting to make their point, rather, argument.
You cannot live forever. But you can buy a parts car, even with out a title. It is a very commonly practiced legal situation which requires checking the box on the vehicle registration form at CA Dept. Motor Vehicles that reads paperless transfer of title, it requires that the new owner provides at least a written bill of sale, WHICH WAS PROVIDED. The person asking for legal advice only stated that this salvage parts (or be it how he beieved) purchase was made days prior to the possibly unfounded search of his property where said stolen vehicle was found. If it had been within the 10 days CA DMV provides grace period to accomplish this transfer, then he is not guilty and quite possibly a victim of harassment which is so common in his area, the civil procedure laws are almost nonexistent.

He should not need an attorney to defend his case, the Deputy District Attorney at the Victorville Superior courthouse (I don't know if Apple Valley has their own location, i doubt it) should have, and with any interest in justice, dismissed this cas when he, if he read the complaint. The incident took place about 6 months ago, so it may have never actually made it to be filed with the courts. But if you have any knowledge of the way this county's justice system holds it proceedings...it is probably getting postponed if they haven't already convinced this "hardened criminal" to plea bargain his way out of hard prison term. I hope he exercises his civil right to a speedy trial, if the case were filed.
And if he has been to the box, as they say...I hope the public defender made the obvious motions to supress, dismiss and quash.

You aren't as smart as you think.
The rules of civil procedure do NOT apply to a CRIMINAL case. Nor is there a CIVIL right to a speedy trial. Keep gabbing though. With every word, you prove you are clueless.

 

[Ohiogal]

Zig's advice was bullyish advertising for the entire legal system of counsel. (Keep quiet about this so no one whom knows that your basic civil rights were violated, along with all kinds of civil procedure laws. The CA vehicle codes were mocked, by simply charging him with pc496!

"...don't speak with your buddies about it, don't speak with your parents about it..."
Yeesh, yeah, only do what your attorney directs you to do after you she'll out the cash, because he has your best interest in mind. Because he doesn't want you to have to feel the burden of the cost of going through to trial, he wants the DA to drop the charges before any motions are made. Because he is your criminal defense attorney.

In a criminal case, it is NOT civil procedure. It is criminal procedure.

 

[Ohiogal]

As far as I am concerned, the first question out of any defense counsel to this person should have been "are you guilty", assuming the answer is, (as it always is, correct?) one consistent with a "not guilty" pleading, #2 should be maybe why did the authorities come into contact with this vehicle on your property, did you allow this? Why?
Bottom line is that the burden of proof lied with the prosecution. He has the power not to file if the arresting agency was acting a little bit off the legal spectrum....because it isn't on the cop to know the law like that. His handbook is with him to seek for guidance when his discretion is not enough. The arrest may be an innocent mistake, but the filing is not to be taken so lightly.
No one has shown any thought I'm the world as to the procedures that officials SWEAR SOLEMN OATES TO UPHOLD.

Yet, no one asked him if he was aware that the vehicle on his property that he had keys (only truly relevant if he were the theif, which he is being charged with) and a bill of sale which BACK UP HIS DEFENSE AND even if his story is riddled with what Zig refereed to as red flags, it is the prosecutions job to earn those salary figures. And the PD is the first one to sell his soul. Cause his promotion makes him DA

More idiocy. I don't want to know if my client is guilty or not. Why? Because if I KNOW he is guilty, I am NOT allowed to mislead the court arguing innocence. I don't care if someone is guilty when I represent them. I ask ONLY for facts that can help me. You are quite frankly idiotic and have no clue. You are an idiot about the public defender as well. Their promotion does not make them DA. You really have no clue. None at all. I don't even know why I am answering you except to protect others from your moronic assertions. Go to school little girl and try to educate yourself.