PC 496D (a) Charge

[whowelookinfor]

More idiocy. I don't want to know if my client is guilty or not. Why? Because if I KNOW he is guilty, I am NOT allowed to mislead the court arguing innocence. I don't care if someone is guilty when I represent them. I ask ONLY for facts that can help me. You are quite frankly idiotic and have no clue. You are an idiot about the public defender as well. Their promotion does not make them DA. You really have no clue. None at all. I don't even know why I am answering you except to protect others from your moronic assertions. Go to school little girl and try to educate yourself.

1)Did you always want to be a lawyer, growing up?
2)Why?

(Question #2 answer optional)

I don't think I could stay interested long enough to finish the tedious classes I would have to finish. I am a bit moody, have been all my life. Although, sometimes I think I could have at least started law school
Who knows, you kinda got to have something like that either hardwired in your DNA, or trained for it...from childhood. I view churchgoung in the same way...wither you learn to gruel through that sermon once or twice weekly from early childhood, or you don't do it in adulthood without making yourself bear through it.

I don't think it is ethical for counsel to agree to defend a man in any criminal proceedings with the notion of his guilt. I guess my government teacher was giving me the wrong idea in continuation high scool. Hmmm.
Just plead the case out and get it over with, right? I mean, the trial is really where that stuff matters, I refer to providing a defendant with counsel and represent his best interest. Too much weight is placed on a criminal case and it's jury or court trial...considering it is such a controlled hearing. Voir dire motions (is that correct? I am now a little shy with my words...) see to that.
So, maybe the PD doesn't promote to DA, if not, then why is it seem that all deputies and officers of the court basically treat the ("not") people of the state, like expendable lives wasting their time.
Law enforcement is nessecary, do not get me wrong. I belive in the system that was intended for the American Justice courts, (confession: i just used a phrase I am unsure of what it really is....supreme, superior, municipal, I guess I think I just named a 1990's cable TV show....please, lemme have it, again, if so) .
A sworn oath to keep peace and uphold ...blah blah blah obligates a certain protocol be followed during the game. There are different duties assigned to different positions so that the accused is given a fair shake, otherwise, you have a lynching.
So, to me, if I am HTA for a crime in which I am being accused-I am now part of this system, it's myself as well as the magistrate. With all of the facts and opinions collected in preparation for this hearing, I would hope no one loses sight of the fact that in addition to constitutional law, the benefit of the doubt, throughout all of those "red flags" in a my story, or any other man's, should be given very careful consideration to its PLAUSIBILTY, and thoroughly insvestigated. Because, the bottom line is that, while it may only matter to you from 9am-5pm...the outcome will. Ertainly alter my life and livelihood. So, if I am innocent, rather, if I am not guilty, the system is designed to give it the fairest chance to be seen.

It is truly the point I feel is overlooked. I am a nobody, I am aware. If I go away for any amount of time, I am not missed. Unfortunate, but so. However, doesn't mean jail, prison or work furlow is my place. If I mattered, I would matter, but since I

 

[whowelookinfor]

In a criminal case, it is NOT civil procedure. It is criminal procedure.

No, but criminal procedure must still be followed, it may not apply to a criminal as you may see a criminal. But it is supposed to be followed by those in which whom enforce the laws, correct?

And I will admit, I don't recall, off hand, how I used that one, but I do know it is an area of law that commoners like me do not have any reason to come familiar with its exsistance.
I would have been out of topic boundaries with that one...though. criminal law section....you know...I can't remember how I stumbled upon this thread, seriously.
This guy's thread hit home for me, though. Apple Valley is roughly 40 minutes down the desolate hey from me...same county, which covers more area than most US states. Although a different courthouse, less beaurocracy, less special funding....but San Bernardino none the less.

I won't be writing a book, but I do hope one day that the fairy tale story of a day that a scrupulous attorney stumbles onto this place. Of course, he would have to be naive enough to think the world could be a better place for mankind, while egotistical enough to strive to be a hero and bring order to a place in need of an overhaul.
It is not often witnessed by outsiders, and is certainly not often acknowledged, officially, but the way of the world differs a little from place to place.
There is a proverbial line drawn all across the country, I am aware, good guys and bad guys...where are you gonna stand?
I am the most boring person I know. Seriously. Certainly not one to set out and cause trouble. I happen to agree with most laws on a philisophical level, because they used to be based, anyway on the golden rule, I think. Just written with scrutinizing detail because a situation come up with out a law to govern.
But if I had to pick a side to identify myself as belonging to....I would be in a state of dilemma. Because either side knows not the other, therefor shuns the petspective. This to me seems extremely unbalanced...and either end of the seesaw seems, well, one sided.
Liberty....life...etc.

Pardon my poor attitude, but until I lose it, I am afraid I gotta own it. Maybe if you see it from my perspective, you will forgive my tainting your duscussion area with my presence.
I cannot see things from a perspective that cannot come down of his perch. C'mon, slum a little. I am a bit haywire when I go off on a tangent I feel passionate about, I spout off for the sake of taking my audience for a ride...because I know, chances are, they will not follow. Why would anyone consider any idea that contacts their own version of things.

Why would any one ever have another man's intetest at heart, anyway? Not gonna happen.

It is disheartening to live a life not worth defending. I don't know why the firing squad isn't returned to handle the business of less desirable peers.