• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Recording Audio Sound In Public Places (Legality)

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

acvegasUSA

Junior Member
Nevada Law (USA)

In the state of Nevada (NRS 200.690) - is it illegal to record audio conversations in public places (such as outdoors) without the other persons knowledge?:confused:
 


NIV

Member
The law referenced is the penalty for violation of previous statutes. The statute most likely to be affected here:
NRS 200.650 Unauthorized, surreptitious intrusion of privacy by listening device prohibited. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, and 704.195, a person shall not intrude upon the privacy of other persons by surreptitiously listening to, monitoring or recording, or attempting to listen to, monitor or record, by means of any mechanical, electronic or other listening device, any private conversation engaged in by the other persons, or disclose the existence, content, substance, purport, effect or meaning of any conversation so listened to, monitored or recorded, unless authorized to do so by one of the persons engaging in the conversation.
I guess it would depend on if the recording was surreptitious or not.
 

justalayman

Senior Member
It also depends on whether their conversation would be considered private. Not all conversation heard in a public area are fair game. Often times if the speaker took effort to keep the conversation private it is still considered private. The answer you seek will depend on the specifics of the situation at hand at the time of the recording
 

FlyingRon

Senior Member
Actually giving the cite in NIV's post, I'd go the other way. Unless the speech was intentionally public or the recording/listening device obvious, I believe such would fit under the definition of surreptitious.
 

quincy

Senior Member
Actually giving the cite in NIV's post, I'd go the other way. Unless the speech was intentionally public or the recording/listening device obvious, I believe such would fit under the definition of surreptitious.
It is best to record without audio unless those you are recording have consented.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top