playtoy608
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Florida
is a warrant legal if it does not contain the specifics required by rule 41
was served a warrant. the only thing on the warrant was a place to be searched. The rest said see attachment a and b. When executed the attachments were not with the warrant and when asked received a reply of a judge signed it, its legal. after consulting a criminal lawyer on this I got a I don't know. the attachments took 3 weeks to get. my opinion is the search warrant was not valid because it did not conform to rule 41 or if legal they could only search for attachment a and b. Everything else was stolen. nothing was specific. did they violate the 4th amendment. as far as i am concerned these are not minor infractions on this warrant. fyi have not been arrested nor had any response from anyone for 4 years and hearing rumors of employees being arrested. guess I may be next.
This was done by a secret service agent. I did not know what they were searching for and gave no permission for any searches. Was placed under confinement with a police officer over me so I couldn't move. Repeatedly told you are not under arrest. The inventory was done without me present, handed a piece of paper while they were leaving, had some cash and equipment on it but no signatures were on it. Also read that the warrant must have time and day on it and it does not. it has to be executed on or before the 16th of July but not an actual date and time of July 10th 2014 at 10:15 am. Also got a question on the knock, no-knock part of a warrant. It did not say it was a no-knock warrant but they stormed our business with guns and screamed where are the guns and drugs and didn't identify themselves until I approached one of them and asked. by the way its a wire fraud warrant. need more ask but I don't know anything and can not afford a lawyer because of disability I am on and barely living.
is a warrant legal if it does not contain the specifics required by rule 41
was served a warrant. the only thing on the warrant was a place to be searched. The rest said see attachment a and b. When executed the attachments were not with the warrant and when asked received a reply of a judge signed it, its legal. after consulting a criminal lawyer on this I got a I don't know. the attachments took 3 weeks to get. my opinion is the search warrant was not valid because it did not conform to rule 41 or if legal they could only search for attachment a and b. Everything else was stolen. nothing was specific. did they violate the 4th amendment. as far as i am concerned these are not minor infractions on this warrant. fyi have not been arrested nor had any response from anyone for 4 years and hearing rumors of employees being arrested. guess I may be next.
This was done by a secret service agent. I did not know what they were searching for and gave no permission for any searches. Was placed under confinement with a police officer over me so I couldn't move. Repeatedly told you are not under arrest. The inventory was done without me present, handed a piece of paper while they were leaving, had some cash and equipment on it but no signatures were on it. Also read that the warrant must have time and day on it and it does not. it has to be executed on or before the 16th of July but not an actual date and time of July 10th 2014 at 10:15 am. Also got a question on the knock, no-knock part of a warrant. It did not say it was a no-knock warrant but they stormed our business with guns and screamed where are the guns and drugs and didn't identify themselves until I approached one of them and asked. by the way its a wire fraud warrant. need more ask but I don't know anything and can not afford a lawyer because of disability I am on and barely living.