What is the name of your state? Indiana
I WAS PUT ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE FOR INSUBORDINATION ON 11/8/18. I WAS CALLED IN FOR REVIEW AND TERMINATED ON 11/14/18. THE PROBLEM IS THAT I FOUND OUT TWO WEEKS AFTER THE FACT THAT I WAS ACTUALLY TERMINATED ON 11/8 AND IT WAS DELIBERATELY WITHHELD FROM ME. IS THIS LEGAL?
My separation documents were signed 11/14. I applied for unemployment and the state was told my termination was 11/15. I received insurance documentation this morning that states I was, indeed terminated on 11/08 under the guise of being put on administrative leave for one week. Upon checking the benefits department of my employer, it was VERIFIED that my employer terminated my employment on 11/08 without informing me, therefore, stringing me along for a full six 6 days and lying about it to me and the State of Indiana.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED VARIOUS TRAINING THAT YOUNGER EMPLOYEES WERE PARTY TO FOR THE PAST YEAR AND A HAlf TO WHICH I HAVE DOCUMENTATION OF THE COMPLAINTS.
I think this might have been about skirting the discrimination. I was a regular, un-exempt, hourly employee.
I WAS PUT ON ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE FOR INSUBORDINATION ON 11/8/18. I WAS CALLED IN FOR REVIEW AND TERMINATED ON 11/14/18. THE PROBLEM IS THAT I FOUND OUT TWO WEEKS AFTER THE FACT THAT I WAS ACTUALLY TERMINATED ON 11/8 AND IT WAS DELIBERATELY WITHHELD FROM ME. IS THIS LEGAL?
My separation documents were signed 11/14. I applied for unemployment and the state was told my termination was 11/15. I received insurance documentation this morning that states I was, indeed terminated on 11/08 under the guise of being put on administrative leave for one week. Upon checking the benefits department of my employer, it was VERIFIED that my employer terminated my employment on 11/08 without informing me, therefore, stringing me along for a full six 6 days and lying about it to me and the State of Indiana.
I HAVE BEEN DENIED VARIOUS TRAINING THAT YOUNGER EMPLOYEES WERE PARTY TO FOR THE PAST YEAR AND A HAlf TO WHICH I HAVE DOCUMENTATION OF THE COMPLAINTS.
I think this might have been about skirting the discrimination. I was a regular, un-exempt, hourly employee.