You are right - we're all making assumptions.Assumptions not supported by anything stated.
A personal review of the ACTUAL terms of sale is required to know where buyer and seller stand legally in regard to the leases currently in effect.
Nah, more at LdiJ, adjusterjack, and me, I'm sure
Of course they are not supported by what has been said. I have asked the OP to give more detail of the situation. They were merely examples of possibilities.LdiJ, your scenarios are not supported by anything stated.
A personal review of the ACTUAL terms of sale is required to know where buyer and seller stand legally in regard to the leases currently in effect.
Sounds to me that the issue was completely ignored or it was agreed that the seller would keep already paid rents.The contract did not include any information pertaining to any permits purchased from previous owner prior to the sale. After the sale, I was provided a list of people who purchased permits from him as a "courtesy" but he would be keeping the monies paid for those permits.
If the agreement was that he keep previously paid rents and the OP is taking actions that to make him pay those rents back to the renters then, yes, he has grounds to sue. If he isn't then the renters have grounds to sue the OP.I have reached out to those people and let them know they would need to purchase new permits from me and should ask for a refund from previous owner. Previous owner is now threatening to sue me. Does he have any legal ground to stand on?
What did the contract include, then?What is the name of your state? LA
I purchased a pay by semester parking lot near a university. The contract did not include any information pertaining to any permits purchased from previous owner prior to the sale. After the sale, I was provided a list of people who purchased permits from him as a "courtesy" but he would be keeping the monies paid for those permits. I have reached out to those people and let them know they would need to purchase new permits from me and should ask for a refund from previous owner. Previous owner is now threatening to sue me. Does he have any legal ground to stand on?
There are a lot of possibilities. Should we list them all? Or should Roobert (or an attorney in his area) read over his purchase documents to see exactly what he purchased and what he didn't?Of course they are not supported by what has been said. I have asked the OP to give more detail of the situation. They were merely examples of possibilities.
Rcobert.There are a lot of possibilities. Should we list them all? Or should Roobert (or an attorney in his area) read over his purchase documents to see exactly what he purchased and what he didn't?
Thanks for the correction.Rcobert.
(Minor quibble.)
Hopefully Rcobert will return and answer some of our questions, clarifying the situation.
Of course we are. That's where all the fun is.You are right - we're all making assumptions.
You are easily amused.Of course we are. That's where all the fun is.
We did. He refused and threatened to kill the deal if we insisted. The permits are for the upcoming spring semester.You should have insisted (before closing on the property) that he transfer to you the prorated amount of money still unused for those permits. How much time was left on the permits?
We will have a local attorney review the contract tomorrow. I really appreciate the feedback and banter so far. To clarify, the parking lot was included with the purchase of an apartment complex. There was no language in the contract pertaining to the parking lot whatsoever. Weeks prior to closing, we asked for information pertaining to the parking lot and any purchases that had been already made for the upcoming (future) semester. The day prior to closing, we were informed that 3 purchases were made at 225 a space and that they would be keeping the monies paid. We asked our closing attorney to negotiate turning over all or part of those funds at closing (FYI, the apartment rents were turned over, pro rated of course). The attorney failed to reach an agreement on turning over the fees and the seller threatened to kill the deal if we pushed the issue. We decided to eat the loss and let it go. The day after closing, we were informed it was not 3 but now 8 previous purchases made at 225 a spot. I decided at that point to reach out to those purchasers and ask them to ask for a refund from previous owner and repurchase spots from me. I have also asked for proofs of purchase or receipts and as of yet received nothing.Thanks for the correction.
I think Rcobert would be better off having his purchase contract reviewed by an attorney in his area, to see what exactly it is that he purchased.
Thank you for the additional information.We did. He refused and threatened to kill the deal if we insisted. The permits are for the upcoming spring semester.
We will have a local attorney review the contract tomorrow. I really appreciate the feedback and banter so far. To clarify, the parking lot was included with the purchase of an apartment complex. There was no language in the contract pertaining to the parking lot whatsoever. Weeks prior to closing, we asked for information pertaining to the parking lot and any purchases that had been already made for the upcoming (future) semester. The day prior to closing, we were informed that 3 purchases were made at 225 a space and that they would be keeping the monies paid. We asked our closing attorney to negotiate turning over all or part of those funds at closing (FYI, the apartment rents were turned over, pro rated of course). The attorney failed to reach an agreement on turning over the fees and the seller threatened to kill the deal if we pushed the issue. We decided to eat the loss and let it go. The day after closing, we were informed it was not 3 but now 8 previous purchases made at 225 a spot. I decided at that point to reach out to those purchasers and ask them to ask for a refund from previous owner and repurchase spots from me. I have also asked for proofs of purchase or receipts and as of yet received nothing.
Well, there you go.We decided to eat the loss and let it go.
Well then, I guess you didn't want to kill the deal.We did. He refused and threatened to kill the deal if we insisted. The permits are for the upcoming spring semester.
We will have a local attorney review the contract tomorrow. I really appreciate the feedback and banter so far. To clarify, the parking lot was included with the purchase of an apartment complex. There was no language in the contract pertaining to the parking lot whatsoever. Weeks prior to closing, we asked for information pertaining to the parking lot and any purchases that had been already made for the upcoming (future) semester. The day prior to closing, we were informed that 3 purchases were made at 225 a space and that they would be keeping the monies paid. We asked our closing attorney to negotiate turning over all or part of those funds at closing (FYI, the apartment rents were turned over, pro rated of course). The attorney failed to reach an agreement on turning over the fees and the seller threatened to kill the deal if we pushed the issue. We decided to eat the loss and let it go. The day after closing, we were informed it was not 3 but now 8 previous purchases made at 225 a spot. I decided at that point to reach out to those purchasers and ask them to ask for a refund from previous owner and repurchase spots from me. I have also asked for proofs of purchase or receipts and as of yet received nothing.