WOW! "
You are listening to these people?''
PLEASE don't believe anyone telling you that you are totally without legal recourses against your neighbor. Or that it is too late to recover the expenses incurred in defending the neighbor's failed legal efforts.
What you
may have is not a claim for defamation, but depending on the neighbor's grounds/motive or lack of it in seeking the protective order, etc. etc., just
maybe a doable tort action against your neighbor for "
abuse of process".
Moreover, and most importantly neither your metaphorical "
ship" nor your legal means of seeking redress for the neighbor's allegedly wrongful conduct have left the dock! IT IS NOT TOO LATE!
Wiser heads would have told you that your right to pursue such a tort claim did not fully mature or accrue until the neighbor's legal proceedings were concluded and terminated in your favor. *
Clearly no one here can accurately forecast the odds of your success in pursing such a claim. All I can tell you is that the elements needed to prove it are:
- improper use of the court’s process;
- ulterior or improper motive of the defendant in exercising such illegal use of process;
- damage to the plaintiff resulted from such abuse of process
Historically these are very difficult claims to prove. And not particularly favored by the courts as they have the tendency of discouraging people from accessing the courts in addressing legitimate grievances . You would do well to consult with a local attorney and then ponder your future course of action.
But do not walk away thinking that you needed to take some positive action prior to the termination of the neighbors proceedings seeking the PO. You could have asserted the abuse of process as a counter claim, but it would not one of a compulsory nature. Meaning it survived and time wise is governed by Nevada's applicable statutes of limitation.
___
[*]
Liere v. The State of New York # 2012-041-002, Claim No. 116203, Motion Nos. M-79839, CM-80187, CM-80456 "With respect to accrual of an abuse of process claim:
There is no conclusive determination as to when such a cause of action accrues (see, e.g., Beninati v Nicotra, 239 AD2d 242). While the Court of Appeals has held that in an action under Court of Claims Act § 10, 'accrual of a cause of action for abuse of process need not await the termination of an action in claimant's favor' (Cunningham v State of New York, 53 NY2d 851, 853), here the abuse of process would not have been actionable until the proceeding was concluded since plaintiff would not have been able to allege that he suffered an injury without justification until the proceeding was terminated"(Dobies v Brefka, 263 AD2d 721, 723 [3d Dept 1999]."