The cops will be called so quick I doubt many will even see the sign...
Thanks Quincy, I agree.
Thank you for your question. I think it would be better for me to answer your question in regards to 'all of my potential actions', rather than just publishing the tapes, if you don't mind. I expect to accomplish a few things.
. Yes, I want her to be punished and feel it. As a sidenote, I worked for the past 4 months making very little money at that restaurant, knowing that the summer months are when you make good money everyday. I was fired on the first day of the 'summer months'. I consider her actions to be selfish and somewhat egregious. She's not getting a free-pass. Not so fast.
"The EEO laws prohibit punishing job applicants or employees for asserting their rights to be free from employment discrimination including harassment. Asserting these EEO rights is called "protected activity," and it can take many forms. For example, it is unlawful to retaliate against applicants or employees for:
Simply, you are wrong, as I showed in #1.
Simply, you are wrong again. Tom Hank's character was told he was fired for one reason, where in fact he was fired for another reason. I was told I was fired for one reason, where in fact I was fired for another reason. In said movie, they retaliated against him out of fear and anger. In my circumstance, they retaliated against me out of fear and anger. There is most definitely a LARGE overlap between the two situations.
Actually, there is something called "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES". If you have time, take a look at the First Amendment. On the other hand, I did read this in Wikipedia: "It is a common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, including private, non-governmental entities. It is only applicable to state actors."
About 10 years ago, I was seeking unemployment from a job whereby I had quit do to being asked to engage in illegal activities by my supervisor at the hospital I was working at. They objected to the claim. I went through the rounds of 'mediation-determination' for whether or not I was entitled. I lost 2 or 3 rounds in a row. My option at that point was to file a lawsuit (don't recall 100%, but I think it was classified as a lawsuit) against the employer, though I had no money to hire an attorney. I would have to create the brief myself by following a 'template-brief' provided by the court or unemployment board (don't recall whom). Let me take a guess. You (and 'commenter' and likely others) would probably have said not to pursue - "YOU HAVE NO CHANCE WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY"! I made my brief without ever consulting an attorney for anything. The brief was great, I must admit.
Thank you for your concern, I do appreciate it. I must admit that I have had to re-read your comment multiple times to try to understand it. The content of the messages: Well, let's just say that I only posted the part whereby, in one conversation, I was told that I would be contacted and given a decision by management. And then in another conversation, I posted management, stating, overall, that what I was saying was not true. I could keep it that simple.
Wrong. You seem to be assuming you know what my sign will say. "Laugh", no. It will cost them money and the manager only cares about her bonus. What is her bonus based on? The amount of money the restaurant takes in. She will most definitely not laugh, however, your comment is laughable.
Actually, they will be called quicker than you think. I'm going to call them and let them know what I am doing right before I step on the 'public sidewalk' and/ or public street in front of their building.
Quincy, after having time to research a little bit more, I say the following. Retaliation for notifying management about the harassment I was experiencing on the job from this employer. They retaliated by cutting my hours and then firing me, claiming it had nothing to do with that. Management was seriously concerned that I was going to file a lawsuit against them for harassment. I had told management previously that one of my parents is an attorney, hence, the greater fear. Additionally, I was sexually assaulted by a fellow employee and they were worried I would file a lawsuit for that as well, hence, more fear. The assault happened about 6 months before all of this. I filed a complaint with the manager and district manager. When I first filed my complaint with the manager, just her and me, truly, she 'victim shamed' me because, as she quite angrily put it, "now i have to report this to my district manager!" She became even more resentful to me when the accused was fired by the district manager and she 'lost a grill-man', which increases the odds that she would have to work the grill if there was a shortage. I wonder if being 'victim-shamed' is a form of harassment. BTW, I am male. Thank you.
WIKIPEDIA PAGE FOR 'US CONSTITUTION 1ST AMENDMENT': "Despite the common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, the text of the amendment only prohibits the federal government, along with the states and local governments, from doing so." Is the local police department in a county or large city, like NYC, considered to be "state, or local governments"? If so, and if they were to tell me to leave or be arrested, it would seem that they would clearly be violating my first amendment rights.
