https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title59.1/chapter5/section59.1-69/
§ 59.1-69. (Effective January 1, 2020) Certificate required of person transacting business under assumed name.
A. As used in this chapter, unless the context requires a different meaning:
"Commission" means the State Corporation Commission.
"Person" has the meaning prescribed in § 1-230.
B. No person shall conduct or transact business in the Commonwealth under any assumed or fictitious name unless such person files in the office of the clerk of the Commission a certificate of assumed or fictitious name.
C. No person shall use an assumed or fictitious name in the conduct of the person's business to intentionally misrepresent the geographic origin or location of the person.
Code 1950, § 59-169; 1968, c. 439; 1987, c. 702; 1995, c. 168; 1996, c. 904; 2017, c. 594.
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/1-230/
§ 1-230. Person.
"Person" includes any individual, corporation, partnership, association, cooperative, limited liability company, trust, joint venture, government, political subdivision, or any other legal or commercial entity and any successor, representative, agent, agency, or instrumentality thereof.
(emphasis added)
I put a link to the form in my prior response. Following that link takes you to a fillable PDF.zddoodah, did you use the Virginia SCC online form to enter multiple names?
You're welcome - best of luck to you moving forward.This is perfect, Zigner. Thank you very much!
I believe the problem you are having is that you likely need to file a different form, specifically, SCC59.1-7-BE available at https://www.scc.virginia.gov/pages/Forms-and-Fees
(Certificate of Assumed or Fictitous Name - Business Conducted by an Entity)
The answer to that should be contained in the trust....will we both need to sign while submitting the form in the name of the Trust?
The form itself has different (additional) options beyond that, including a "business trust".Thanks. We were looking at that form, but the SCC rep said that the BE Business Entity form requires an LLC or something more than a DBA (which we don't want)..... So it looks like we'll have to stick with SCC59.1-70-IN.
The OP has rental properties that are owned by his (and his wife's) revocable trust. He'd like to use a DBA to conduct business related to those properties.Maybe I missed something but what is the assumed or a fictitious name in this case?
That's a whole different ball of wax. A "DBA" won't protect your personal information in the case of filing a lawsuit.And if we ever have to take a tenant to court, we will do that in the name of our DBA and not in our personal name(s).)
A DBA is not a person can cannot sue in court. A DBA is simply a name that a person/entity uses for business other than the person's/entity's legal name.And if we ever have to take a tenant to court, we will do that in the name of our DBA and not in our personal name(s).)