quincy
Senior Member
Saying no is always an option, if the boulders are actually on Harbor’s property.Which is why my suggestion was to just say no.
If the boulders are located on the neighbor’s property but were placed around the tree by the neighbors (past or present) to prevent erosion, there could be a legitimate argument raised by Harbor that they remain in place.
If the boulders are on Harbor’s property, he is within his rights to say no to their removal. That answer is not likely to prevent the neighbor’s construction of the pool, however, and could cause a rift between neighbors.
I think Harbor should have a landscaping professional take a look at his property to offer an opinion on the necessity of the boulders.