Is this possible?

[stealth2]

This is ambiguous. Are you saying that both the child and the mother live with the aunt during the mother's custodial time? Or is the child living with the aunt without the mother there?

Zippy - read OP's other thread.

 

[Zigner]

Not sure why it matters if I posted differently…..

THIS is why:

This is ambiguous. Are you saying that both the child and the mother live with the aunt during the mother's custodial time? Or is the child living with the aunt without the mother there?
(Etc.)

Keeping your related questions together allows the full picture to be seen by the responders. Of course, you've made it clear that you wanted to get different answers because you didn't hear what you wanted to hear in the first thread. Hiding the full picture was what you intended to do.

 

[Taxing Matters]

Of course, you've made it clear that you wanted to get different answers because you didn't hear what you wanted to hear in the first thread. Hiding the full picture was what you intended to do.

Also, it matters because when you change or hide relevant facts then the feedback you get is worthless to you. What good does it do you to get answers based on facts that are different from the situation you actually have? After all, a judge is going to make a decision based on all the evidence presented, and so if you want an idea of how that will really go then give us everything that the judge would hear — the good and the bad. Hearing just what you want to hear is a set up for a rude surprise later when a judge tells you what you DON'T want to hear.