Driver was pulled over for the light. Driver was asked to do a FST due to other indicators that the officer (correctly) perceived. The OP was just barely under the per se limit.I have to say that it is a bit unusual for an officer to want to do a sobriety field test when a driver is only pulled over for a broken taillight.
I understand. I was just curious what the “other indicators” were that led to a request for the FST.Driver was pulled over for the light. Driver was asked to do a FST due to other indicators that the officer (correctly) perceived. The OP was just barely under the per se limit.
I'd guess that odor was a big indicator, coupled with the OP's admission that she had been drinking.I understand. I was just curious what the “other indicators” were that led to a request for the FST.
Admitting to drinking could certainly lead to a sobriety field test.I'd guess that odor was a big indicator, coupled with the OP's admission that she had been drinking.
Could have been a slow shift. The officer could have been under quota. The officer could have been in a bad mood. Police officers are human beings too and sometimes do things for the wrong reasons.I have to say that it is a bit unusual for an officer to want to do a sobriety field test when a driver is only pulled over for a broken taillight.
Put more annual miles on my bike than my car the past several yearsA breathalyzer of 0.0 is always good.
I bet you are happy to be cycling past gas stations right now.
I have too long of a commute to make cycling (or walking) a realistic option for me, unfortunately. When I lived in Philadelphia, however, owning a car was more trouble than it was worth (horrific parking) and I was able to walk or take public transportation wherever I needed to go. Although I love to drive, I really miss Philly.Put more annual miles on my bike than my car the past several years