The parties decide whether or not something requires notarization, (with a few exceptions) therefore the parties have some control over whether or not something that is fully disclosed is acceptable. The parties can't allow a deviation from the standards as far as establishing identity (although there is a great deal of leeway there, far more than most people realize) but unless state law specifically prohibits something, the parties wishes can factor in if they are in agreement.
As I said, in the case I handled, the attorney involved was fine with "remote notarization" and so was the judge. State law didn't address that one way or another.