• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Parenting Time suspended (long)

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

ncpdad

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? NJ

Hi. I am putting my saga out here, and looking for input on how things should have been done differently, and advice on any areas that can be fixed or where I need to proceed in an alternate direction.

I am representing myself pro se after 7 years of postdivorce actions and questionable actions by attorneys. I am not able to obtain a lawyer.

BM and I were divorced in 2000. At the time, we had a 6 year old daughter, who has now turned 13. We share joint custody (that is exactly as the divorce decree reads) with BM being the Parent of Primary Residence. Standard visitation set, every Wednesday night, EOW, alternating holidays, time on birthdays, 2 weeks in summer. BM and I have never lived further than 5 miles from each other.

In 2003, BM filed a motion requesting that I be barred from taking DD to the doctor except for emergencies. I had taken DD to a doctor after three years of runny noses which had not been investigated past "colds" by the pediatrician. I am not provided by Mom with any information about child's health - I requested the child's medical records from her pediatrician. Allergist found basic dust, tree, grass allergies and prescribed allergy medication. Mom also claimed that I was mentally abusive to child and that this action of taking DD to doctor was actually part of my plan to separate DD from BM.

In 2004, BM filed seeking supervised visitation only, claiming mental abuse. She withheld visitation starting from a month prior to filing, claiming child did not want to see me. Child was 9 at the time. Court ordered risk assessment, which came back advising reunification and counseling. Family went to counseling, where Dr. recommended continued counseling. This all went on for approximately one year, 4 months before there was contact with DD, another 4 months before any overnights, and then another 4 months before the judge interviewed the child. Immediately following the interview, the judge returned visitation to the way it had been since the divorce.

In 2007, DD came to me requesting that I seek a change in custody. BM had remarried, was not giving any time to DD. BM was siding with new stepchildren, including forcing our 12 year old to follow the bedtimes of her 7 and 4 year old stepsiblings so as to not upset steps. Mom historically did not check homework, take interest in the child's life and concerns, and did not do the parenting things that DD saw me do and wanted from her mom. Child also wanted to attend church, and Mom always said ok, but then overslept so that they could not attend. Child, on Mom's decision, attends a private Christian school, and school policy actually requires that child be in fellowship with a Bible believing church, so the child's request was not out of line with Mom's responsibilities. Child wrote a letter to the court, requesting the change, and giving reasons. I gathered certifications from 17 people, stating that DD was happy, well-adjusted, and well-parented in my care. I also included emails between BM and I in which BM refused routine medical and educational information regarding the child, BM claimed that she did not report to me and therefore needed to give me no information. Also included were emails in which BM refused all additional requests for visitation, including requests that were initiated by child.

The day after the papers were properly filed in court, BM called 10 minutes before visitation, claiming DD was sick and could not come for visit. The following week, BM called 10 minutes before visitation, claiming that DD was in a panic over seeing me. I offered to meet BM and DD somewhere to talk about the situation. BM refused. I went to the police station, and met the police at BM's home, where I was told that DD was screaming because I showed up. They refused to enforce the visitation order.

The next day, I attempted to file an exparte to get visitation enforced. Judge's clerk claimed that unless DD was bleeding, I would not be able to get an order from the judge, especially since we had a date on my custody motion.

The day after that, I was served with a motion obtained by BM suspending my parenting time pending a show cause. Included in the motion was a repetition of BM's past complaints, which she had previously filed, and a letter from a CSW who worked out of the police dept. The CSW claimed to have met with child 2x, first on the day that she was "sick" and then the day of the 2nd missed visitation. CSW claimed that I play power games on my child, that my child is terrified of my historic treatment of her, and recommended suspension of all parenting time.

At the show cause hearing, I provided an additional 17 certifications from different people - pastors, neighbors, friends, congregants, and family members saying that DD had never been afraid of me. I also submitted a letter from our family counselor, who stated child and I had an excellent relationship,and that there was no fear.

Judge admitted to being spineless and refused to completely discount the CSW's report, even though he said that the recommendation seemed a bit of a stretch from the facts. He ordered 2 phone calls with child, a court risk assessment, custody evaluation to be done, and a plenary hearing on the custody motion. He also ordered a GAL. At a later date, he ordered nightly phone conversations, since proceedings were going more slowly than he anticipated.

At the end of the risk assessment, the risk assessor simply stated what my ex and I each said, stated that my DD said she was "emotional exhausted from dealing with me." and that she said I never let her be right. She also cited a letter from CSW which stated that DD wanted fewer phone calls with me. Risk assessor recommended psychological evaluations.

At the same time as the risk assessment was done, the GAL finally met with DD. He said DD wanted no fewer than three phone calls a week, and was amenable to starting supervised visitation, with an eye to reunification. He also stated, with no factual description provided, that DD wanted to rescind her certification to the court and that she was content with the current living situation. The judge ordered that the previously ordered custody evaluator be used to do the psychological evaluations recommended by the risk assessor. Judge ordered the three parties to schedule supervised visits. I spoke with GAL that day, and agreed to a supervisor. All of the choices, both from DD and BM came completely from BM's side of the family, even though there are numerous family members and friends on my side which were offered. We did not hear from the GAL for 7 weeks, despite multiple phone calls, letters, and emails from me, BM's attorney, and DD.

When the phone calls were each night, DD was frequently not available to take the call, or was not at a place where she could talk (movies, dinner out, at a friend's house). Once the calls went to three days a week, DD only answered the phone one day a week, even though I called three times. We had three phone calls, each lasting over 20 minutes. We spoke of simple things, school projects, movies we saw, shows on television. One the day of the last call, I asked DD if she wanted me to call the next night. She emphatically said yes. However, 2 1/2 weeks went by with no answer to phone calls. The judge had been away at some sort of training for two weeks. Opposing counsel was refusing emails from me because I had used an email confirmation software at one time. Finally, the GAL wrote saying that my abuse of my daughter had continued despite the lack of parenting time, and that I was using our phone time to abuse her. He claimed that my DD now did not want to speak to me on the phone, did not want to see me, and that I might in fact never see my daughter again.

I made an appointment with the psychologist who was to do the psychological evaluations. He requested further clarification from the court as to what he was supposed to do, since, strictly speaking, a psychological evaluation is not a psychological term. He attempted to call the court and the GAL but got no information. He and I had an intake session, since that would be the same no matter what eventually was done.

I also, by the point, had done some research and had discovered that the CSW who had written the initial report for the court, an additional report for the risk assessor, and was continuing counseling with my DD, was not actually licensed by the State to do counseling. His CSW has expired three years ago. He is not certified by any of the three state boards which certifies counselors. When I asked him for permission to confirm his credentials, he refused, stating first that he was not going to be used, and then that it was a matter of confidentiality. I was also informed that as a CSW, a social worker is not permitted to perform any clinical counseling. A social worker must be a LSW or LCSW in order to do clinical work. I informed the court and the two counsels of this counselor's lack of credentials.

to be continued...
 


ncpdad

Junior Member
continued...

A week later we had a conference call, in which OC and the GAL stated that the child wanted nothing to do with me, including phone calls. The judge stated that the court was looking into the matter of the uncertified social worker. No order was made ceasing my daughter's counseling with this therapist pending investigation, so she continues to see him. The judge signed an order once again ordered DD and me into psychological evaluations, with no further clarification.

After the conference call, I received a copy of a letter from the GAL requesting a written report from the uncertified counselor as to how the counseling was going, and where he saw it proceeding.

It has now been over six months since I've seen my daughter, 3 months since I spoke to her. Because of an order forbiding me to speak to my daughter regarding pending litigation, I was not allowed to speak to her about this whole mess or our relationship when we were speaking on the phone. I naturally am confused by why the system thinks that this is a proper way to manage the relationship between a parent and a child.

I met with the evaluator for my testing at the beginning of November. Child was scheduled for 2nd week of Nov., but had to cancel the appointment, and was rescheduled for end of November. I attempted to contact the psychologist this week to find out what's going on. He left a message stating that he was having trouble getting information from Mom and child in order to complete the report. I don't quite know what that means.

We're now in a holding pattern. I can't talk to my daughter. BM won't send me any information about how DD is doing at school, so I can see her grades change online, but I don't know how she's actually doing, can't see her essays and papers. I've asked the school for copies of syllabuses, and they tell me that I need to get it from my daughter. I've been robbed of my daughter on the testimony of a man who lied to the court about his qualifications.

I think all I can do is wait, but I don't know. I'm bothered by the fact that our police department recommends this counselor to the parents of troubled teens, and he's not even a counselor. I'm troubled by the fact that in BM's show cause certification, she claims that the day that DD called in sick from her visitation, there was a police officer at the house, that he encouraged my DD to talk to me and to tell me that she was sick and couldn't visit (even though she was not ill), and that he then listened to the conversation on speakphone, a conversation which I thought was private. I'm at the point of believing that they have completely turned my daughter and I will never see her again.

This is the girl who insisted cooking me a fancy dinner on Father's Day. She doesn't hate me, and she's not afraid of me. The lawyers refuse to tell me anything that she has said, just claiming these generic "she's intimidated by you." statements. Her "counselor" refuses to give me any information, including how many times they've met.

Advice, opinions, anything?
 

Silverplum

Senior Member
My suggestions:
1. Shorten this. Then again. And again.
2. Don't ask volunteers to review what you did wrong in the past, as well as what your X did wrong. That's for you to ruminate upon, if it matters to you.
3. Ask your legal question/s in a concise fashion.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
I did read the whole thing and I have to assume that you don't have an attorney...and that you really NEED one.

It certainly does seem that things may be going oddly in your case, and that very well could be a result of you not having an attorney.
 

Ohiogal

Queen Bee
I also would agree that based on what you are saying you are stepping in between mom and daughter and maybe intimidating daughter. Why? Because you refer to your ex as BM -- birth mother -- which unless this is an adoption and her rights were terminated, is insulting, arrogant, and disgusting. Your ex is MOM NOT BM.
 

2Mistakes

Senior Member
I also would agree that based on what you are saying you are stepping in between mom and daughter and maybe intimidating daughter. Why? Because you refer to your ex as BM -- birth mother -- which unless this is an adoption and her rights were terminated, is insulting, arrogant, and disgusting. Your ex is MOM NOT BM.
OG, maybe he meant Bowel Movement?!?!:D:p
 

ncpdad

Junior Member
I'm in NJ

First of all, I am the stepmom writing for the NCP dad. On other legal boards that we use, it is 1.) completely appropriate to post a full disclosure of what the case is so that one seeking to provide advise has a relatively full picture in front of them. 2.) normal to use abbrievations to describe family members. Generally, one uses BM or BF to describe the birth mom and birth father, as opposed to any steps that might be involved. It is not a term of derision, simply a way to identify parties. My husband is BF, mom is BM, I am SM, BM's husband is SF. These are not "insulting, arrogant, and disgusting". They are matters of fact. I apologize that I did not use the proper terminology for this board.

Additionally, we are not looking for mistakes that the child's mom has made. And quest for legal mistakes is exactly what the question is, so I suppose the opinion is that we should have kept our mouth shut and ruminated on our own.

I'm curious if my use of the legal term BM is the only reason that the dad in this situation is being seen stepping in between mom and daughter and potentially intimidating the daughter.

It is correct that dad is pro se (representing himself). He cannot possibly afford an attorney. He has no available funds, he supports his second family as well as his first. I am a stay at home mom with an infant. His income is too high to obtain legal aid - additionally, mom works for legal aid, in the family part. He works a second, and at times a third job to make ends meet.

I'll list specific questions this time without background information.

1. Is it appropriate for a custodial parent to know of a potential problem with a noncustodial parent, make counseling arrangements, and proceed to court without attempting to mediate the situation?
2. Secondarily, is it appropriate for the counselor to fail to attempt to mediate the matter, and immediately make a recommendation to the court?
3. Is it legally responsible to presume that since an original recommending counselor's credentials turn out to be completely false, that a court should ignore the original recommendation and any subsequent recommendations from that "counselor"?
4. Is the court allowed to permit a non-State certified counselor to continue in counseling with a minor child?
5. Is it appropriate for a GAL to disappear from all three parties for 7 weeks without explanation?
6. Is it appropriate for a GAL to fail to meet with a noncustodial parent, particularly when the noncustodial is accused of abuse?
7. Is it appropriate for the court to investigate only the claims of abuse made by the custodial parent and not seek to address any of the concerns made by the noncustodial parent, even when the noncustodial concerns were made first?
8. Is it appropriate for the custodial parent to refuse to provide any medical, dental, counseling information to the noncustodial parent, saying that she doesn't report to him?
9. Once a GAL is assigned, does the custodial parent still have the responsibility to enforce a court order - ie - court orders child and father must have phone calls each night, custodial parent claims child does not want to talk to father and that CP doesn't know what to do without the GAL telling her what to do.

I'll stop there. I hope that this format is better suited to this forum.



Without providing the background information
 

ncpdad

Junior Member
parenting time suspended revisited

I'm in NJ

First of all, I am the stepmom writing for the NCP dad. On other legal boards that we use, it is 1.) completely appropriate to post a full disclosure of what the case is so that one seeking to provide advice has a relatively full picture in front of them. 2.) normal to use abbrievations to describe family members. Generally, one uses BM or BF to describe the birth mom and birth father, as opposed to any steps that might be involved. It is not a term of derision, simply a way to identify parties. My husband is BF, mom is BM, I am SM, BM's husband is SF. These are not "insulting, arrogant, and disgusting". They are matters of fact. I apologize that I did not use the proper terminology for this board.

Additionally, we are not looking for mistakes that the child's mom has made. And a quest for legal mistakes is exactly what the question is, so I suppose the opinion is that we should have kept our mouth shut and ruminated on our own.

I'm curious if my use of the legal term BM is the only reason that the dad in this situation is being seen stepping in between mom and daughter and potentially intimidating the daughter.

It is correct that dad is pro se (representing himself). He cannot possibly afford an attorney. He has no available funds, he supports his second family as well as his first. I am a stay at home mom with an infant. His income is too high to obtain legal aid - additionally, mom works for legal aid, in the family part. He works a second, and at times a third job to make ends meet. There is significant debt left from the original marriage and credit issues, which were caused, with her admission, by the first wife.

I'll list specific questions this time without background information.

1. Is it appropriate for a custodial parent to know of a potential problem with a noncustodial parent, make counseling arrangements, and proceed to court without attempting to mediate the situation?
2. Secondarily, is it appropriate for the counselor to fail to attempt to mediate the matter, and immediately make a recommendation to the court?
3. Is it legally responsible to presume that since an original recommending counselor's credentials turn out to be completely false, that a court should ignore the original recommendation and any subsequent recommendations from that "counselor"?
4. Is the court allowed to permit a non-State certified counselor to continue in counseling with a minor child?
5. Is it appropriate for a GAL to disappear from all three parties for 7 weeks without explanation?
6. Is it appropriate for a GAL to fail to meet with a noncustodial parent, particularly when the noncustodial is accused of abuse?
7. Is it appropriate for the court to investigate only the claims of abuse made by the custodial parent and not seek to address any of the concerns made by the noncustodial parent, even when the noncustodial concerns were made first?
8. Is it appropriate for the custodial parent to refuse to provide any medical, dental, counseling information to the noncustodial parent, saying that she doesn't report to him?
9. Once a GAL is assigned, does the custodial parent still have the responsibility to enforce a court order - ie - court orders child and father must have phone calls each night, custodial parent claims child does not want to talk to father and that CP doesn't know what to do without the GAL telling her what to do.

I'll stop there. I hope that this format is better suited to this forum.
 

Silverplum

Senior Member
I'm in NJ
First of all, I am the stepmom writing for the NCP dad. On other legal boards that we use,
On the other boards you use, you have been told that Dad REALLY NEEDS an attorney.
ncpdad said:
I apologize that I did not use the proper terminology for this board.
That's okay. Glad you understand how we are here. :)
ncpdad said:
Additionally, we are not looking for mistakes that the child's mom has made. And a quest for legal mistakes is exactly what the question is, so I suppose the opinion is that we should have kept our mouth shut and ruminated on our own.
Yeah, that's my opinion. There's no point in our going over years of stuff. Forward, forward always, is my thing.
ncpdad said:
I'm curious if my use of the legal term BM is the only reason that the dad in this situation is being seen stepping in between mom and daughter and potentially intimidating the daughter.
I doubt it. Ohiogal is a family law attorney, and capable of making judgements.
ncpdad said:
It is correct that dad is pro se (representing himself). He cannot possibly afford an attorney. He has no available funds, he supports his second family as well as his first. I am a stay at home mom with an infant.
In the real world, those are called, "Natural and Logical Consequences of Choices."
ncpdad said:
His income is too high to obtain legal aid - additionally, mom works for legal aid, in the family part. He works a second, and at times a third job to make ends meet.
Good for him, meeting his obligations to his children. :)
ncpdad said:
There is significant debt left from the original marriage and credit issues, which were caused, with her admission, by the first wife.
WHO was ordered to pay the debt in their divorce?
ncpdad said:
I'll list specific questions this time without background information.
1. Is it appropriate for a custodial parent to know of a potential problem with a noncustodial parent, make counseling arrangements, and proceed to court without attempting to mediate the situation?
2. Secondarily, is it appropriate for the counselor to fail to attempt to mediate the matter, and immediately make a recommendation to the court?
That depends largely upon their decree, whether or not they are required to mediate first. Other things can account for this.
ncpdad said:
3. Is it legally responsible to presume that since an original recommending counselor's credentials turn out to be completely false, that a court should ignore the original recommendation and any subsequent recommendations from that "counselor"?
4. Is the court allowed to permit a non-State certified counselor to continue in counseling with a minor child?
Generally, "the court" can do as it deems best. I'm sure the judge knows what s/he is doing.
ncpdad said:
5. Is it appropriate for a GAL to disappear from all three parties for 7 weeks without explanation?
6. Is it appropriate for a GAL to fail to meet with a noncustodial parent, particularly when the noncustodial is accused of abuse?
I'll let a GAL answer those.
ncpdad said:
7. Is it appropriate for the court to investigate only the claims of abuse made by the custodial parent and not seek to address any of the concerns made by the noncustodial parent, even when the noncustodial concerns were made first?
Again, the court does what it deems best. I dunno about "appropriate."
ncpdad said:
8. Is it appropriate for the custodial parent to refuse to provide any medical, dental, counseling information to the noncustodial parent, saying that she doesn't report to him?
Generally, no. Depends again upon their decree.
If she is supposed to provide such info -- and usually the CP is -- use the sample letters and info at deltabravo.com.
ncpdad said:
9. Once a GAL is assigned, does the custodial parent still have the responsibility to enforce a court order - ie - court orders child and father must have phone calls each night, custodial parent claims child does not want to talk to father and that CP doesn't know what to do without the GAL telling her what to do.
A court order is in effect until changed by another court order. Remedy is to file contempt.
ncpdad said:
I'll stop there. I hope that this format is better suited to this forum.
Thanks for setting out your legal questions in a simpler format. :)
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
It is not a term of derision, simply a way to identify parties. My husband is BF, mom is BM, I am SM, BM's husband is SF. These are not "insulting, arrogant, and disgusting".

The Players:

Mom = Mom

Dad = Dad

Step Mother = SM

Step Father = SF

Others = Irrelevant
 

ncpdad

Junior Member
The other boards that we have been with are familiar with the long term situation and actually have given opinion that in NJ, an NCP dad is likely screwed no matter what, attorney or no :).

The original post actually is just detailing the last six months, which is how long this current issue has been going on. There currently is no forward, forward, forward, because they are still stuck in the now that won't move on.

I'm glad to hear Ohiogal is a family law attorney. I'd be interested in the other details which caused her to come to the conclusion that she has. I hope she reposts.

Natural and Logical Consequences are fine... he doesn't bemoan what he has to do for his choices. The statement was merely meant to explain why dad can't afford an attorney when mom files a retaliatory motion with unreliable witnesses after dad files according to what the child's wishes and to enforce litigants rights.

Incidentally, he's done just as well pro se as his previous lawyers have done.

The congratulations on him meeting his obligations came across as a bit snide - perhaps you didn't mean it that way. Once again, I was simply trying to explaint that since he already works two - three jobs, he can't squeeze in another one... generally, the advice given to a pro se litigant is to get another job so they can afford legal representation.

Once again, the comment about the debt was not meant to absolve him of anything - he agreed that he would assume the debt in exchange for keeping their ten year old car and not paying alimony, as well as keeping their joint tax refund. That does not remove the fact that when she forged his signature on credit card applications and ran up $25k in unpaid bills, his credit, not hers, suffered damage that could not be removed. From my research, I believe that his divorce attorney hurt him - most of us know that using generic and nonspecific language in a divorce and custody decree leads to more problems down the road.

They share joint legal custody, with equal imput on major medical decisions. There is no mention in the decree regarding mediation or what to do when their opinions differ. In fact, the custody portion of their decree simply includes the joint custody, with mom being PPR, child support, dad's responsibility to maintain insurance with the standard $250 paid first by mom, followed by the 50/50 split, and a statement that mom must pay for the first two years of child's private school since she made the unilateral decision to enroll the child. Oh, and standard wed., EOW, alternate holiday, time on child and dad birthday, and two week vacation visitation.

Assuming the judge knows what he is doing is one of our legal concerns. Judge was only on the family court bench for six months before this case came up. Previous to that, he was a judge for 1 year doing property issues, and previous to that, he was a construction lawyer. In the first hearing, he made some decisions which he changed an hour after the hearing, on the advice of another judge. All subsequent conversation has been through conference calls between parties.

Are there GAL's who post here?

There is nothing in the decree which dictates that mom must tell him anything. However, if mom does not mention it, dad will not know, unless he calls each of child's doctors each week to find out whether child has been seen. Counseling is impossible, because child's previous counselor will not talk to dad or release records without mom's consent, which mom will not provide, stating that there is no legal reason for dad to need mom's consent - true, but not helpful when counselor refuses to release unless they have it. The new uncertified counselor has been ignoring all communication from dad for two months now and before, would not even tell dad how many appointments were held, claiming confidentiality.

Court ordered calls via phone conference - there was no written order. Dad made calls for 19 straight days with no answer. Wrote to opposing counsel and GAL, with no response from either. Finally, OP wrote stating that mom was awaiting input from GAL, since she claimed child didn't want to talk to dad. Dad contacted the court, requesting a phone conference to discuss - judge was out of town for training for three weeks. When he returned, he waited another two weeks before scheduling a phone conference. During that conference, judge said that if mom said that child didn't want to talk, they needed to get psych evaluations done on dad and child pronto. They then waited another two weeks while psychologist got confirmation of what he was supposed to be evaluating. This was two months ago. Dad has done his part - psychologist now claims that he cannot get mom and child to cooperate. I

Legal questions

1. Is it possible to motion for contempt on the basis that mom is not complying with the court's order to proceed with the psychological evaluation?
2. Is it possible to appeal decisions in an open case when there aren't written orders?
 

Just Blue

Senior Member
Question - should dad be insulted that the GAL consistently refers to dad as "Natural Father"?
I would remind the GAL that he is the ONLY father therefor a qualifier is unnecessary.

The situation has ONE Father and ONE Mother...And two LEGAL STRANGERS.
 

ncpdad

Junior Member
I apologize... I was being a bit snide... what they are all called is not an issue, and I found it a little odd that everyone here gets so upset about it... Dad doesn't care what he gets called as long as he gets to see his daughter and be her daddy, as he has always been... I can imagine the response to a letter from my husband to the GAL stating that he is the child's only father... yet another example of how controlling dad is and that he has to argue every small point... he figures it is smarter to stick to the issues that are important - like resolving the larger issue and not worrying about small insults.

I'm sure that dad would appreciate your input into the legal situation
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
I'm in NJ

First of all, I am the stepmom writing for the NCP dad. On other legal boards that we use, it is 1.) completely appropriate to post a full disclosure of what the case is so that one seeking to provide advise has a relatively full picture in front of them. 2.) normal to use abbrievations to describe family members. Generally, one uses BM or BF to describe the birth mom and birth father, as opposed to any steps that might be involved. It is not a term of derision, simply a way to identify parties. My husband is BF, mom is BM, I am SM, BM's husband is SF. These are not "insulting, arrogant, and disgusting". They are matters of fact. I apologize that I did not use the proper terminology for this board.
Its true that many other legal forums the term BM and BF is acceptable/normal as a reference to bio-mom/bio-dad in a divorce/unwed situation. I am personally familiar with this. However, despite that personal familiarity, its still insulting. Mom is mom, dad is dad, and the rest of the people in a child's life can be designated via abbrevations.

Additionally, we are not looking for mistakes that the child's mom has made. And quest for legal mistakes is exactly what the question is, so I suppose the opinion is that we should have kept our mouth shut and ruminated on our own.[/quote}

That is confusing. I have no idea what you really mean.

I'm curious if my use of the legal term BM is the only reason that the dad in this situation is being seen stepping in between mom and daughter and potentially intimidating the daughter.
No, its not. Based on what you described in the case and its progress, and all of the professionals involved, its a natural possibility that the professionals are viewing dad that way.

It is correct that dad is pro se (representing himself). He cannot possibly afford an attorney. He has no available funds, he supports his second family as well as his first. I am a stay at home mom with an infant. His income is too high to obtain legal aid - additionally, mom works for legal aid, in the family part. He works a second, and at times a third job to make ends meet.
Perhaps you should be finding a way to contribute to the familly income too.

I'll list specific questions this time without background information.

1. Is it appropriate for a custodial parent to know of a potential problem with a noncustodial parent, make counseling arrangements, and proceed to court without attempting to mediate the situation?
Depending on the circumstances, yes its quite possibly appropriate.

2. Secondarily, is it appropriate for the counselor to fail to attempt to mediate the matter, and immediately make a recommendation to the court?
Again, yes, its quite possibly appropriate, depending on the circumstances.

3. Is it legally responsible to presume that since an original recommending counselor's credentials turn out to be completely false, that a court should ignore the original recommendation and any subsequent recommendations from that "counselor"?
That one is probably too complicated to address here. A person could possibly have legal credentials as a court professional/evaluator without other credentials as a counselor.

4. Is the court allowed to permit a non-State certified counselor to continue in counseling with a minor child?
Perhaps...again, probably too complicated for an internet forum.

5. Is it appropriate for a GAL to disappear from all three parties for 7 weeks without explanation?
Possibly, depending on the overall circumstances of the situation and case.

6. Is it appropriate for a GAL to fail to meet with a noncustodial parent, particularly when the noncustodial is accused of abuse?
Not normally, no. However if CPS has been heavily involved that could effect things.

]7. Is it appropriate for the court to investigate only the claims of abuse made by the custodial parent and not seek to address any of the concerns made by the noncustodial parent, even when the noncustodial concerns were made first?[/quote}

No its not appropriate for all concerns to be addressed, on both sides.

8. Is it appropriate for the custodial parent to refuse to provide any medical, dental, counseling information to the noncustodial parent, saying that she doesn't report to him?
It is not appropriate for the CP to deny access to the NCP without a court order. However that doesn't necessarily mean that the CP has to provide it to the NCP...it may mean that the CP may not stop an NCP from getting the info directly from the providers.

9. Once a GAL is assigned, does the custodial parent still have the responsibility to enforce a court order - ie - court orders child and father must have phone calls each night, custodial parent claims child does not want to talk to father and that CP doesn't know what to do without the GAL telling her what to do.
It depends on the case and what authority the judge has given to the GAL.

I



Without providing the background information
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top