T
Tercr6
Guest
By reading the post & reading some on NPD. I beleive we need to separate Legal Entitlements & Emotional Feelings,as I beleive the courts have already done.
Unless there is " A Change of Circumstances " that would be legaly " In the best interest of the child", i beleive the father will continue his visits.
The mother claim Physical Abuse in the very early age of the child,nothing since or now.
The mother claims emotional abuse,by the father ,plus the posters assume emotional harm being done to the child ),yet the child is in no way ,or as we know of ,ever been in treatment for Emotional Disturbances.
While a person with NPD suffers from different Mental disturbances with this "illness", it is not legal sufficiant Denie the parent of visitation rights.
Example:would a Parinoid Schizophranic with Homosidal & suisidal Ideations,be denied visitations solely on his Ideations? NO
So,why should a Parent be denied visitation soley on his diagnosis,and "unnormal " veiw of life ?
From my reading on NPD this Parent,even though the other disaproves of his lifestyle & relation w/ the child, could accuallity grandios hisself by the mear fact he has accoplished visitations,and a relationship with the child,and is no harm to the child.
Life is full of disagreements,but the courts look at the legal aspects,and the best interest of the child/
If the child 'is-not" being gravely Emotionally harmed by visitations with the NPD parent,( wich is obvious from lack of therapy),Then it IS in the best interest of the child at this time,to have a relationship w/ both Parents,and if the NPD parent is unable "due to his illness wich he has no control", to Normal guide the child in reallity,maybe the other parent should stay"mute" ,or try explaining as a prior poster suggested,his father has an illness,and he can't help the way he acts,and help the child deal with it for the childs' Emotional stability,unless or until "Circumstances Change".
Unless there is " A Change of Circumstances " that would be legaly " In the best interest of the child", i beleive the father will continue his visits.
The mother claim Physical Abuse in the very early age of the child,nothing since or now.
The mother claims emotional abuse,by the father ,plus the posters assume emotional harm being done to the child ),yet the child is in no way ,or as we know of ,ever been in treatment for Emotional Disturbances.
While a person with NPD suffers from different Mental disturbances with this "illness", it is not legal sufficiant Denie the parent of visitation rights.
Example:would a Parinoid Schizophranic with Homosidal & suisidal Ideations,be denied visitations solely on his Ideations? NO
So,why should a Parent be denied visitation soley on his diagnosis,and "unnormal " veiw of life ?
From my reading on NPD this Parent,even though the other disaproves of his lifestyle & relation w/ the child, could accuallity grandios hisself by the mear fact he has accoplished visitations,and a relationship with the child,and is no harm to the child.
Life is full of disagreements,but the courts look at the legal aspects,and the best interest of the child/
If the child 'is-not" being gravely Emotionally harmed by visitations with the NPD parent,( wich is obvious from lack of therapy),Then it IS in the best interest of the child at this time,to have a relationship w/ both Parents,and if the NPD parent is unable "due to his illness wich he has no control", to Normal guide the child in reallity,maybe the other parent should stay"mute" ,or try explaining as a prior poster suggested,his father has an illness,and he can't help the way he acts,and help the child deal with it for the childs' Emotional stability,unless or until "Circumstances Change".