• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Accident caused injury in hotel in CA

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

goldnucs

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? AZ / CA

While on a business trip in Anaheim, CA [we live in AZ], my wife fell when coming out of the shower in our hotel room. The bathroom had a "roll-in" shower as I am confined to a wheelchair and I had reserved a handicapped-accessible room. The shower area was separated from the rest of the bathroom by a rather steep / slippery stainless steel plate and a rubber gasket which was intended to keep water from running out of the shower. This rubber gasket had separated from the substrate beneath it, however, being that it was rubber, the separation was not noticeable. The tile floor beyond the stainless steel plate continues to slope towards the floor drain. The whole layout of this handicapped-accessible bathroom is flawed and dangerous, but more so as a result of the defective rubber gasket. I have digital photographs documenting all of this.

As she was leaving the shower on the morning of May 31st, my wife's front foot slid down the wet, steep stainless steel plate after catching the toes of her rear foot beneath the detached rubber gasket. This caused her to fall backwards breaking her medial radius in her right arm [she's right-handed] and resulting in further injury to her elbow, shoulder and hip. We filed a report with the hotel that same morning and explained the problem which caused the injury.

Her cast is off now but my wife just began physical therapy this past Monday, August 11th. We had to cancel a subsequent trade show that we were scheduled to exhibit at in Chicago. We've incurred a lot of costs besides the substantial medical expenses, including the costs associated with my personal care (Kristie is my Caregiver), housekeeping, yard maintenance, effects on our business and more.

The California attorney that we hired to deal with the hotel's insurance company called yesterday after receiving the report from the Urgent Care clinic in Anaheim where my wife went for treatment on the day of her injury. The report stated that my wife said that "I was coming out of the shower at my hotel, slipped on the wet floor and hurt my right wrist area." The attorney stated that, based upon this statement (which is second-hand at best), that there is a 95% chance that we would lose a lawsuit if one was filed. This is because she said that she had slipped on the wet floor and failed to elaborate on the cause, i.e.: the defective rubber gasket.

My questions are:

1] Does this sound plausible?
2] Doesn't the fact that the accident took place on their property render the hotel liable for, at least, 100% of her medical expenses relating to the injury?
3] Whatever the odds of winning/losing a lawsuit are, is the attorney, nevertheless, obligated to abide by our demand that he file a lawsuit should we so desire? He accepted the case on a contingency basis.
 


ecmst12

Senior Member
You need to talk to your attorney. That statement wouldn't even be admissible in court, it's hearsay, just like a police report. Either your lawyer is an idiot, or he's trying to intimidate you into a quick settlement. You are NOT ready to consider settling yet. You may also want to consider getting a second legal opinion.

No, your lawyer is not obligated to file suit if he doesn't feel the expense and time would be justified. He can drop your case instead.
 

goldnucs

Junior Member
Yeah, that's what I thought (referring to the hearsay point). He (our attorney) even went so far, to convince me of his position, to tell me that there was a lady who died as a result of a fall at a Costco whose husband lost his case at trial because "someone" said that she had said that she "had to run to the bathroom" and the jury found Costco not responsible because she should have "walked", not "run". I was dumbfounded.

Odd thing is that I did my homework checking this attorney out on-line at Avvo and with another LA attorney and he checked out.
 

ecmst12

Senior Member
The difference in that other case is someone must have SEEN the lady run. No one saw your wife fall. And the hotel should have documented that the piece was loose per your incident report. (If you took photos of it, even better).
 

goldnucs

Junior Member
Not unless they had a hidden bathroom webcam...LOL.

We reported the injury within hours of her fall and specifically made reference to the dangerous / faulty shower floor to the hotel manager in addition to various front-desk personnel and filed a report in writing (which I kept a copy of, although it doesn't reference the faulty floor). We took names of the hotel staff and had friends who were with us who helped photograph the scene.

Do I copy and send my attorney this correspondence or will that just anger him and give him cause to withdraw as counsel?
 

ecmst12

Senior Member
1. That's against the TOS for this site
2. You don't want a lawyer who trolls for clients on message boards.
 

goldnucs

Junior Member
Ah, good points. Assuming my attorney is NOT an idiot, would it not appear that that we have a very winnable case and, if so, why would he want to rush into a settlement when he's collecting 40%?! In addition, the injured's husband [yours truly] is a quadriplegic, which, although it has no real bearing on the case, could certainly play into a jury's decision on some subconscious level.
 

ecmst12

Senior Member
Most likely, you won't go to trial. Few cases do. And I'd guess that your lawyer wouldn't mind having $20 now over $200 later (much later).
 

goldnucs

Junior Member
Sure seems to point to a case where the attorney is not acting in the best interest of his client, thereby acting in unethical fashion. I guess, however, that since the time value of money is completely subjective, I should "suggest" that he see it my way or I take my business elsewhere. Does that appear to sum-up the situation?
 

You Are Guilty

Senior Member
IMO, these types of cases, while winnable, require a bit more effort than the "standard" slip and fall type accidents. For example, to properly get the evidence before a jury, you'll need an engineer to testify as to not just the code requirements for ADA accessibility (things like ramp slope, and coefficients of friction) and experts are not cheap. Many PI attorneys shy away from cases where they might have to expend extra time/effort/money to win a case.

However, there are plenty of other attorneys who don't mind the challenge, so my best guess is to run your claim past a few other lawyers to see if any of them bite. (Be sure to ask them how many trials they've had in the last 12 months for a good idea on whether they're court-shy). Oh, and don't rely on internet lawyer-rating sites. Most are chock full of inaccuracies. Call your local bar association for a referral.

Good luck.
 

tranquility

Senior Member
For any one of a number of reasons, the wife's statment would get in. Either it is not hearsay or it is admissable hearsay--depending on the reason.
 

goldnucs

Junior Member
Why would / should it be admissible? It's a one-line, not even a sentence, abbreviated quick-note "quote" on an intake form taken at an urgent care clinic on a Saturday by a "nurse-type person" who was at the end of her shift trying to get out and go home.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top