• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Bank over paid contractor and lost my money

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

whammo77

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? Oklahoma

Ok, I'll make this as short as possible. My daughter decided to build a new house here locally. A realtor suggested a home builder to her (which is who she used), and then she set up a construction loan/mortgage with a local bank.

Long story short, the bank handled all of the money and all of the money disbursements... the bank had done other home projects with this contractor before, so they didn't bother to inspect his progress before giving him money (they trusted him). They also were not asking him for receipts. So, he manages to squeeze $130k out of the bank (total loan was for $150k) before my daughter found out what was going on. Unfortunately, only about $60k worth of work/materials had been delivered/accomplished.

When my daughter found out how lop-sided the funds-to-work-completed ratio was, she confronted the bank and the contractor about it. The contractor promptly bailed and now no one can find him. He won't return calls, etc etc. We've had a PI looking for him, but he cannot find the contractor either.

Next thing you know, all of the subcontractors are banging on her door (HVAC, plumbers, electricians, roofers, etc) wanting money because the contractor had never paid them. So the bank wasn't making sure that the sub-contractors were getting paid by the contractor either.

So now, my daughter went to the bank to basically ask "ok, you gave him all this money, what do we do now?". The bank told her it is her problem and that she's on the hook for all of the money. What??? Again, the bank handled all the money, all the transactions, all of the payments, failed to do their due diligence in inspecting the progress of the work, and just blindly handed the contractor money..... and they want my daughter to be on the hook for it????

The next kicker is going to be liens... since the contractor didn't pay any of the subs for their work or materials, I'm quite certain they're going to file liens against her property. Ok, I get they want to be paid, so I don't blame them. But again, this is all a mess that was created by the bank not properly managing the money.

Another interesting note is that the bank at first claimed that the contractor had a bond in place with them for the construction, but when my daughter asked them for the information (after he bailed) they backtracked and claimed they didn't have a bond from him.

So, I'm just wondering if anyone has ever dealt with this and what the proper way forward might be. Obviously, yes, there is the lawyer option. At best, that's going to take a minimum of three years to resolve (if you even win the case). And let's just be honest, if you don't win it, you're going to be on the hook to a lawyer for another $40k or more going that route if you lose. As if the situation isn't bad enough already....

So, I'm just looking for suggestions... maybe consumer protection agencies or something? Not sure really who to contact for help. There's got to be someone tho, right?

And am I wrong thinking that since the bank handled all the money/disbursements and kept my daughter out of that loop, THEY should be on the hook for him bailing with all that money and NOT my daughter??? Why would she be liable for THEIR screw up and for them trusting the contractor and not following protocol??

Thanks in advance.
 


LdiJ

Senior Member
What is the name of your state? Oklahoma

Ok, I'll make this as short as possible. My daughter decided to build a new house here locally. A realtor suggested a home builder to her (which is who she used), and then she set up a construction loan/mortgage with a local bank.

Long story short, the bank handled all of the money and all of the money disbursements... the bank had done other home projects with this contractor before, so they didn't bother to inspect his progress before giving him money (they trusted him). They also were not asking him for receipts. So, he manages to squeeze $130k out of the bank (total loan was for $150k) before my daughter found out what was going on. Unfortunately, only about $60k worth of work/materials had been delivered/accomplished.

When my daughter found out how lop-sided the funds-to-work-completed ratio was, she confronted the bank and the contractor about it. The contractor promptly bailed and now no one can find him. He won't return calls, etc etc. We've had a PI looking for him, but he cannot find the contractor either.

Next thing you know, all of the subcontractors are banging on her door (HVAC, plumbers, electricians, roofers, etc) wanting money because the contractor had never paid them. So the bank wasn't making sure that the sub-contractors were getting paid by the contractor either.

So now, my daughter went to the bank to basically ask "ok, you gave him all this money, what do we do now?". The bank told her it is her problem and that she's on the hook for all of the money. What??? Again, the bank handled all the money, all the transactions, all of the payments, failed to do their due diligence in inspecting the progress of the work, and just blindly handed the contractor money..... and they want my daughter to be on the hook for it????

The next kicker is going to be liens... since the contractor didn't pay any of the subs for their work or materials, I'm quite certain they're going to file liens against her property. Ok, I get they want to be paid, so I don't blame them. But again, this is all a mess that was created by the bank not properly managing the money.

Another interesting note is that the bank at first claimed that the contractor had a bond in place with them for the construction, but when my daughter asked them for the information (after he bailed) they backtracked and claimed they didn't have a bond from him.

So, I'm just wondering if anyone has ever dealt with this and what the proper way forward might be. Obviously, yes, there is the lawyer option. At best, that's going to take a minimum of three years to resolve (if you even win the case). And let's just be honest, if you don't win it, you're going to be on the hook to a lawyer for another $40k or more going that route if you lose. As if the situation isn't bad enough already....

So, I'm just looking for suggestions... maybe consumer protection agencies or something? Not sure really who to contact for help. There's got to be someone tho, right?

And am I wrong thinking that since the bank handled all the money/disbursements and kept my daughter out of that loop, THEY should be on the hook for him bailing with all that money and NOT my daughter??? Why would she be liable for THEIR screw up and for them trusting the contractor and not following protocol??

Thanks in advance.
She really does need an attorney. This is not going to get resolved without one. The police maybe even need to be involved as well because this was embezzlement on the part of the contractor.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
And am I wrong thinking that since the bank handled all the money/disbursements and kept my daughter out of that loop, THEY should be on the hook for him bailing with all that money and NOT my daughter??? Why would she be liable for THEIR screw up and for them trusting the contractor and not following protocol??
I believe you are wrong about this. The contractor was HER contractor, not the bank's.

As was suggested, she should speak to the police and to an attorney, likely in that order.
 

HRZ

Senior Member
I agree , lawyer whose practice includes litigation over construction disputes and police ....in that order ...if you contact police first my guess is they will tell you it's a civil matter ...you want some skilled input as to if there is a criminal matter in all this
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
I believe you are wrong about this. The contractor was HER contractor, not the bank's.

As was suggested, she should speak to the police and to an attorney, likely in that order.
I do think that the bank had some fiduciary duty to manage the money well. I suspect that somebody at the bank is going to get fired over this. However, that does not change the fact that she needs an attorney and needs to speak to the police.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
I agree , lawyer whose practice includes litigation over construction disputes and police ....in that order ...if you contact police first my guess is they will tell you it's a civil matter ...you want some skilled input as to if there is a criminal matter in all this
Fair enough.
 

HRZ

Senior Member
IF it's a local bank they may be anxious not to be pulled into the mud on all this...and they might have more leverage than the homeowner ...
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
I do think that the bank had some fiduciary duty to manage the money well. I suspect that somebody at the bank is going to get fired over this. However, that does not change the fact that she needs an attorney and needs to speak to the police.
I suspect that a careful reading of the loan agreement would be required to determine what level of fiduciary duty the bank had.
 

LdiJ

Senior Member
I suspect that a careful reading of the loan agreement would be required to determine what level of fiduciary duty the bank had.
Of course, hence the need for an attorney. However, the requirement that the bank manage the money only, confers some level of fiduciary duty.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top