madinmd said:The buyer never specified what she meant by leaking and since we never had any leaks in the 3 years that we owned the house and the previous owner (who also owned the house for 3 years) never disclosed any window problems either, so we are confused by this buyer's claim.
madinmd said:thanks. We are waiting for the buyer to get a hearing through the realtor's association. Our realtor does not even think that they will waste time on this case. We have contacted our lawyer and told him to draft a letter to the buyer stating about what you said- to stop harassing us with frivilous claims, we have no liability, that she signed contracts stating as much, and that we will pursue legal action against HER for our costs associated with defending ourselves.
Declining mediation might not be the best idea. I don't know about your state but in CA, a party who refuses or resists mediation is not entitled to recover prevailing party attorneys' fees. Something to think about.madinmd said:OK- now the buyer has had all of the windows replaced (found out from several former neighbors) and we just received the forms from the MD Realtor's Assoc. that the buyer is requesting mediation. What in the heck is there to mediate? Her own lawyer advised her not to pursue any claims against us. We are considering declining mediation (we have to pay at least $100 for mediation and have already paid our lawyer over $500 to deal with this so far) because her claim is unfounded. Opinions, please!