• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Can a legal action still be harassment?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

commentator

Senior Member
I agree with this, the only thing this guy is going to be able to get out of you if you fire him is that due to the wishy washy way you have handled the situation, he may end up qualifying for unemployment insurance which could raise your company's unemployment tax rate. What you do is be very specific, give very succinct warnings to accompany the suspension as to what he did that you consider unacceptable. He doesn't get to explain it away. He may refuse to sign a written warning, but if you've given him one, and notated that he refused to sign it, that's all you need to do.

He needs to be fully aware that any sort of questionable behavior of this type in the future is going to be grounds for immediate termination. And then you need to terminate him as soon as there is another questionable incident. And I'd say the recording incident you describe is another unacceptable action in spite of his stupid excuses.

To keep someone from receiving unemployment, you have to have a clearly established misconduct cause, where the individual was aware that their behavior was unacceptable and that they are in danger of being fired, and then if there is a repeat of the creepy behavior, fire him quickly. Don't wish wash around and let him make excuses, and let him continue to work, and then two or three days later, (or two or three weeks later) call him in and fire him. This won't give him a reason to sue you, not an illegal termination, but might accidentally get him unemployment insurance which you do not want to do either.

There is also "gross misconduct" which means something so basically and obviously wrong that the employee would know it was wrong to do even one time. For example, grabbing someone's private parts, or telling another employee he wanted to watch them undress, etc. You should have fired him then instead of giving him a three day suspension and letting him come back to work. But since you did, you need to do the write ups and the whole procedure of firing him now after a suspension.

In providing reason why he was terminated, deal with the employer's misconduct only. Forget about performance issues, they're the most difficult firing reason to prove and keep the person from being approved for unemployment, and if you throw performance of his job into the mix about all this other inappropriate behavior, it will only cloudy the waters. Fire him for behaving as he has, quickly. It is unfair and unjust of you guys, and could very well be cause for a legal action that you are forcing this co-worker he has harassed to put up with further harassment from him.
 
Last edited:


ecmst12

Senior Member
I read the rest of the thread, there is such a thing as gross misconduct that would even preclude unemployment compensation and this situation would almost surely qualify. Even if by some quirk of fate he were to be awarded unemployment, that would be a very small price to pay for the value and protection of your female employees (and a creep like that probably makes ALL of them uncomfortable). It's unconscionable that this is even a question.
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
OP, please remember: You may legally fire an employee for any reason not prohibited by law - his action does NOT have to be illegal before you can fire him for it. This guy needs to be gone, whether his actions constitute illegal harassment or not. While the Federal EEOC requires 15 employees before a harassment claim can be filed, the state of Ohio only requires 4. If he continues to or resumes bothering this girl, you are on notice for it; you can be held liable. You are far more likely to end up on the wrong end of a harassment suit if you keep him, than you are a wrongful termination suit if you fire him. You LEGALLY owe her protection; you do not legally owe him a job.
 

PayrollHRGuy

Senior Member
Please note that the OP wrote 12 employees in the shop. There may be more employees of the employer. If so EEOC could still come into play.
 

HRZ

Senior Member
I don't think a past event for which punishment was delivered and carried out is going to count as gross misconduct ...after all he has redeemed himself and he was retained .

Inaction on a prompt basis about misconduct behind a pallet makes me wonder if it can hold up as gross misconduct ...irrespective of what the witness may say he saw.

IF you are under pressure from your boss to paper gross misconduct ..and reduce odds he qualifies for UC .you best structure a new clear situation this creep is highly likely to violate ...and do so quickly . And catch him .
 

cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
Tell your partner and the CEO what I said - this creep has NO chance whatsoever of a wrongful term suit. The girl, however, could easily file a harassment suit if he is retained and e so much as says Hello to her in a tone she does not like. Wrongful term suits are rarely filed and even more rarely won, particularly where there is no wrongful termination (as in this case). Given the current climate, however, where celebrities all over the US are being sued for sexual harassment - do they REALLY want to run the risk that she'll jump on that bandwagon? Particularly since she has a valid claim?
 

eerelations

Senior Member
Tell your partner and the CEO what I said - this creep has NO chance whatsoever of a wrongful term suit. The girl, however, could easily file a harassment suit if he is retained and e so much as says Hello to her in a tone she does not like. Wrongful term suits are rarely filed and even more rarely won, particularly where there is no wrongful termination (as in this case). Given the current climate, however, where celebrities all over the US are being sued for sexual harassment - do they REALLY want to run the risk that she'll jump on that bandwagon? Particularly since she has a valid claim?
Agree agree agree. OP's CEO should not be worrying about a wrongful term suit - because it isn't going to happen. OP's CEO should be worrying about a sexual harassment suit - because the longer the CEO refuses to fire the creep, the more likely the CEO will be facing a sexual harassment suit. Period.
 

commentator

Senior Member
I really think, in this case, that the employer should take cbg's expert advice. And throw away this employee, the MALE jerk who has behaved inappropriately more than once and in a way you have been made aware of to the FEMALE (therefore of lesser importance or less likely to sue us is what you seem to be projecting in your 1950's, 60's attitude) Fire him NOW because you want to. Don't pay any attention to or even necessarily respond to his claim for unemployment insurance. Yeah, he may be approved for it. Big whoop. The slight rate increase in unemployment tax rates your company might have to undergo if he is approved for unemployment benefits will not be anywhere near the damage that could be done if you "give the guy another chance" and they begin looking sharply at your practice and the way you have treated this female employee by allowing the harassment to continue.

They advertise this stuff on tv all the time." Are you a victim of .....? Pay us nothing unless we win!" She may figure it out quickly, and it will not go well with you if you have not gotten rid of the problem.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top