Can exwife legally prevent new girlfriend from seeing children?

[Antigone*]

Oh for crying out loud, your stbx can't dictate who, what, where and when you are with your girlfriend with your children. A judge won't either. Tell her to pound it and move on with your life as you so choose to. Especially in NV. Just posturing by your sbtx to make your life difficult.

Really, I beg to differ. Telling the mother of your child to pound sand instead of negotiating like parents should is not the way to go.

 

[dmcc10880]

Really, I beg to differ. Telling the mother of your child to pound sand instead of negotiating like parents should is not the way to go.

Oh give me and the OP a break. It's already escalated obviously. You have to draw a line in the sand and do not allow the manipulation. To acquiesce is to give her more power and control.

 

[CJane]

Oh give me and the OP a break. It's already escalated obviously. You have to draw a line in the sand and do not allow the manipulation. To acquiesce is to give her more power and control.

There's quite a lot of ground to stand on between acquiescence and telling someone to pound sand.

 

[stealth2]

Oh give me and the OP a break. It's already escalated obviously. You have to draw a line in the sand and do not allow the manipulation. To acquiesce is to give her more power and control.

Get over yourself.

Again, OP - why can you AND Mom not focus on your kid instead of your sex life?

 

[dmcc10880]

Get over yourself.

Again, OP - why can you AND Mom not focus on your kid instead of your sex life?

None of my business and yours, quite frankly.

They're getting divorced. Does that mean he or she needs to live a life of celibacy until the judgment is signed?

Crawl out from under the rock.

 

[stealth2]

None of my business and yours, quite frankly.

They're getting divorced. Does that mean he or she needs to live a life of celibacy until the judgment is signed?

Crawl out from under the rock.

What it means is they should be good enough parents to be more concerned with helping their child deal with the situation THEY have put her in rather than getting laid. BOTH parents are pathetic, IMO.

 

[CJane]

They're getting divorced. Does that mean he or she needs to live a life of celibacy until the judgment is signed?

Would NOT playing hide the salami with the first available person be so difficult?

 

[CJane]

Apparently. I'm thinking dmcc is short for "do my cute cucumber".

Careful, you'll be joining Silverplum in the thinking spot.

Also? I have NO issues, personally with someone who "moves on" and goes about spreading their wild skillz hither and yon. But seriously? Do they HAVE to meet the kids and get engaged and plan to move in together before there's even an ORDER? Seriously?

"Honey, I really love you and I want to marry you. Just let me take care of this one minor detail with the LAST person I promised to love honor and cherish, and we can get on with loving, honoring and cherishing each other. K? Thanks!"

 

[dmcc10880]

Would NOT playing hide the salami with the first available person be so difficult?

What is it your business in the first place?

If we're talking about a legal forum here, and I assume we are, no judge is going to dictate (especially in Nevada) that a man not have a girlfriend and not allow his daughter to associate with her.

The OP's concern was about his wife making this an issue in court and the bottom line is no judge will chastise him in NV for what he's doing. It's just posturing and manipulation by a crazy ex-wife.

 

[dmcc10880]

Originally Posted by stealth2 View Post
Apparently. I'm thinking dmcc is short for "do my cute cucumber".

That's really uncalled for, even on an internet forum.

 

[dmcc10880]

Careful, you'll be joining Silverplum in the thinking spot.

Also? I have NO issues, personally with someone who "moves on" and goes about spreading their wild skillz hither and yon. But seriously? Do they HAVE to meet the kids and get engaged and plan to move in together before there's even an ORDER? Seriously?

"Honey, I really love you and I want to marry you. Just let me take care of this one minor detail with the LAST person I promised to love honor and cherish, and we can get on with loving, honoring and cherishing each other. K? Thanks!"

Free Stealth2? LOL

This is a legal forum, not a morality forum. Let's try to stay on topic. K? Thanks!

 

[CJane]

What is it your business in the first place?

Here's a secret. It's a public board. He put the story out there. I get to respond. That's how it works.

If we're talking about a legal forum here, and I assume we are, no judge is going to dictate (especially in Nevada) that a man not have a girlfriend and not allow his daughter to associate with her.

Really? NO judge in Nevada would EVER issue a no paramour clause? Are you SURE?

The OP's concern was about his wife making this an issue in court and the bottom line is no judge will chastise him in NV for what he's doing. It's just posturing and manipulation by a crazy ex-wife.

The court WILL decide what will happen, based on the best interests of the child. There's a lot of discretion there. And a judge absolutely COULD - at Mom's request - issue a no paramour order. WILL S/He? Who knows? But it's POSSIBLE.

 

[Proserpina]

Free Stealth2? LOL

This is a legal forum, not a morality forum. Let's try to stay on topic. K? Thanks!

And exactly what have YOU contributed to this discussion, LEGALLY speaking?

Not a damn thing.

Hush your muffin.

 

[CJane]

And exactly what have YOU contributed to this discussion, LEGALLY speaking?

Not a damn thing.

Hush your muffin.

Well you know, Pro, that all things in life require balance.

So when you have a whole bunch of reasonable posts by knowledgeable people, you've got to have the requisite irrational troll posting too, or the universe could implode.

I suppose, in a way, we should be thankful.

 

[Proserpina]

Here's a secret. It's a public board. He put the story out there. I get to respond. That's how it works.



Really? NO judge in Nevada would EVER issue a no paramour clause? Are you SURE?



The court WILL decide what will happen, based on the best interests of the child. There's a lot of discretion there. And a judge absolutely COULD - at Mom's request - issue a no paramour order. WILL S/He? Who knows? But it's POSSIBLE.

I do believe there are several threads confirming that a judge can, and certainly in some instances absolutely WILL, issue such an order in Nevada.

I know YOU know this. Most others know this. I'm jes' sayin'.