(My question is at the end of all this!)
I filed my motion to set-aside the default and it went unopposed for 20+ days, so I recently filed the order for the same. Immediately after filing the motion, the plaintiff had me served in person with the original complaint and summons at the school where I teach. The reason council for the plaintiff gave was "for new address". Right. Anyway...in the complaint I found that the basis of the accusation against me was the declaration of a phone investigation. The investigator claimed to have spoken to me on Sept, 7, 1996 at 817-xxx-xxxx. On that date, my business and business telephone had been closed for over 6 months. (March 6, 1996-according to official phone records obtained by subpoena.) The phone number they listed (the one they claimed to have spoken to me on) was for the business run by the woman I purchased my business from, years before. They claim to have spoken to me, and to an employee of mine. There is no way! I didn't have employees or even a business when those investigations took place! I was living in a different county and have proof. I obtained official phone records by subpoena for the numbers and addresses of my business, and the business they actually called, to prove to the court I was not the owner of the number they called and that I was not even in business when they called. I also provided certified records of my business d/b/a and the d/b/a of the business they actually called, in order to clarify the fact that I am not the owner of that number or business. I included all of this information and attached it all in my response to the complaint. I also moved for dismissal at the same time. I can get tons of other proof to support my claims of innocence, but I am hoping the judge finds this to be enough. I don't really see how the plaintiff's council can argue with me. In order for them to obtain a judgment against me, they are going to have to prove that I was in business at the time of the phone investigation, among other things. They will have to fabricate a whole lot more about me in order to do so. I think I have a pretty good chance of getting dismissed without prejudice.
So.... What's my question?
My question is this:
Providing I get dismissed, or it goes to trial and I am found innocent:
Can I file for damages awarded in the amount of what normal defense lawyer's fees would have been? I have lost a lot of time learning how to defend myself, going to the Federal Court House for filing, research and etc. I have had to turn down offers for making 2 commercial websites, plus set aside plans of opening a small digital imaging business that I had planned to do during the summer months. Am I entitled to obtain compensation for any of this? From what I can see in the complaint, I never should have been named in this suit, and I have proof. I have been forced by the plaintiff to take on the time and expenses of being an actual lawyer, and I feel I should be paid accordingly, since they caused me to have to do this against my will.
(Of course…if I DO get paid, I will have to send you folks your cut!)