• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

can someone please explain this to me

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

H

hexeliebe

Guest
O.K. real quick.

In the matter of 00-A-423570-C the next to last entry was

10/23/2000 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE WITH NRS 14 070

That statute (Nevada Revised Statues Chapter 14, section 070) is something I had wrong above.

This is the actual statue reference:

NRS 14.070 Service of process on operator of motor vehicle involved in accident.

1. The use and operation of a motor vehicle over the public roads, streets or highways, or in any other area open to the public and commonly used by motor vehicles, in the State of Nevada by any person, either as principal, master, agent or servant, shall be deemed an appointment by the operator, on behalf of himself and his principal or master, his executor, administrator or personal representative, of the director of the department of motor vehicles to be his true and lawful attorney upon whom may be served all legal process in any action or proceeding against him, his principal or master, his executor, administrator or personal representative, growing out of such use or resulting in damage or loss to person or property, and the use or operation signifies his agreement that any process against him which is so served has the same legal force and validity as though served upon him personally within the State of Nevada.

2. Service of process must be made by leaving a copy of the process with a fee of $5 in the hands of the director of the department of motor vehicles or in his office, and the service shall be deemed sufficient upon the operator if notice of service and a copy of the process is sent by registered or certified mail by the plaintiff to the defendant at the address supplied by the defendant in his accident report, if any, and if not, at the best address available to the plaintiff, and a return receipt signed by the defendant or a return of the United States Postal Service stating that the defendant refused to accept delivery or could not be located, or that the address was insufficient, and the plaintiff’s affidavit of compliance therewith are attached to the original process and returned and filed in the action in which it was issued. Personal service of notice and a copy of the process upon the defendant, wherever found outside of this state, by any person qualified to serve like process in the State of Nevada is the equivalent of mailing, and may be proved by the affidavit of the person making the personal service appended to the original process and returned and filed in the action in which it was issued.

3. The court in which the action is pending may order such continuances as may be necessary to afford the defendant reasonable opportunity to defend the action.

4. The fee of $5 paid by the plaintiff to the director of the department of motor vehicles at the time of the service must be taxed in his costs if he prevails in the suit. The director of the department of motor vehicles shall keep a record of all service of process, including the day and hour of service.

5. The foregoing provisions of this section with reference to the service of process upon an operator defendant are not exclusive, except if the operator defendant is found within the State of Nevada, he must be served with process in the State of Nevada.

6. The provisions of this section apply to nonresident motorists and to resident motorists who have left the state or cannot be found within the state following an accident which is the subject of an action for which process is served pursuant to this section.

[1:275:1953; A 1955, 453] + [2:275:1953] + [3:275:1953] + [4:275:1953] + [5:275:1953]—(NRS A 1957, 628; 1961, 155; 1963, 800; 1969, 95, 611; 1981, 1591; 1985, 1971; 2001, 2554)


so I go back to my previous statement that this was and is an auto accident. Looks like the first case (this one) resulted in a $38,000 award to one of the parties to the lawsuit.
 


H

hexeliebe

Guest
The one I am interested in is the Jami Spencer case. I am trying to understand what Raquel Graves and Denzil Graves have to do with both cases.
Can't tell you that until they release more information on the new case. So far, as I said, all that is there is the appointment of a guardian ad litum (minor's representative) and the disclosure of fees.

Once more information is released on the new case, we can compare the two and see what is in common.
 
H

hexeliebe

Guest
not a problem.

The screen where you sent us to with the case numbers.

type them in then when the brief summary appears look to the left in the menu. There is a listing for 'Case Activity'. Clicking on that link will give you the entire case file.
 
H

hexeliebe

Guest
That is on the first case with the 00 year. (the one I got wrong by not spelling the name right :rolleyes: )
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top