Car dealership used our signature from a previous car purchase to purchase a new car

[LdiJ]

Oh, how unpleasant. Wifey has a PhD, and her English is better for online communication on forums. If Hubby wanted to buy a car, he would have bought a car, not connect his credit line with an irresponsible person for years to come.
Now, please a real answer.

Actually, that was a likely accurate answer and you just don't realize it. Its very likely that your husband helped the babysitter to purchase a car, did not want you to know, and everybody you have been talking to about it has figured that out. That is why you are not getting any cooperation.

Seriously, do you honestly think that any car dealership would take that kind of risk? Allow someone to claim that somebody else was a cosigner and participate in faking their signatures on a loan application?

 

[Patse3839]

no signature - no contract

the dealership can state whatever the freaken heck they want, without a signature on the loan agreement it is not legal (period)
your coc-a-manie story of 'siding with businesses' makes no sense
take them to court
win judgement
sue the dealership for forgery
ruin their business
case closed
you can come on here and state all you want about the 'ills of society' and the 'corrupt police' - the solution is completely simple - Court!

 

[Antigone*]

the dealership can state whatever the freaken heck they want, without a signature on the loan agreement it is not legal (period)
your coc-a-manie story of 'siding with businesses' makes no sense
take them to court
win judgement
sue the dealership for forgery
ruin their business
case closed
you can come on here and state all you want about the 'ills of society' and the 'corrupt police' - the solution is completely simple - Court!

Talk about coc-a-manie!

 

[annah]

Exactly my point of view! Just looking for a lawyer in zip 93277 who would be willing to take the Groppetti dealership to court.

 

[Antigone*]

Exactly my point of view! Just looking for a lawyer in zip 93277 who would be willing to take the Groppetti dealership to court.

We are not an attorney referral service. In that case Google is your friend.

 

[annah]

Actually, that was a likely accurate answer and you just don't realize it. Its very likely that your husband helped the babysitter to purchase a car, did not want you to know, and everybody you have been talking to about it has figured that out. That is why you are not getting any cooperation.

Seriously, do you honestly think that any car dealership would take that kind of risk? Allow someone to claim that somebody else was a cosigner and participate in faking their signatures on a loan application?

Please, don't forget that they wrote me an email saying that they submitted my signature (which they had on file from previous car purchases!) to business office

 

[annah]

We are not an attorney referral service. In that case Google is your friend.

Google has generated 2 who said the court will not go against this person (or at least they won't, by the sound of it).

 

[Proserpina]

I suspect this is not the first time your husband has had financial..."dealings"...with this babysitter.

 

[annah]

Cannot believe we sought advice from a bunch of single-minded ... Enjoy yourselves. Bye

 

[Proserpina]

Cannot believe we sought advice from a bunch of single-minded ... Enjoy yourselves. Bye

Get thee a divorce attorney.

 

[tranquility]

I, too, call shenanigans. Police won't take a forgery report because of some "intent" nonsense? Dealer wants to go to jail for the sale of a car? (And, sends written evidence of guilt?) Lawyers won't accept money for a lawsuit because they'd lose? Please. I have no idea what is going on, but LOVE how the additional facts came out.

 

[justalayman]

Google has generated 2 who said the court will not go against this person

Bull puckey.

While the attorneys you spoke to may refuse to mount a case against the dealership, that is very different than stating (and as you posted it, it is not suggesting the possibility but an outright statement) the courts will act illegally simply due to who the other party was.

annah
Cannot believe we sought advice from a bunch of single-minded ... Enjoy yourselves. Bye

Take off the blinders dear. The aren't becoming of a claimed recipient of a PhD.

Can we move beyond the fact that the babysitter was female?

who said the babysitter is female? Maybe there are few more things about hubby you don't know.

Yet we never went to a dealer, never signed anything or even saw a loan application, never had the car, did not know the amount or conditions of the loan until the bank has started sending us statements.

Google: electronic signature


that is only one possibility. Others; HE went to the dealership and you are not aware of it. Babysitter brought paperwork to hubby (yours) and returned it to dealership.

Also, the lawyer recommends having possession granted by the civil court and taking over the loan and car. Would be really great if we could avoid this.

If hubby us co-owner of the car, he has rights of possession without even going to court. Gee, and you paid how much for your advice?

He can make all the payments he wants on the loan without changing anything. In fact, the bank would like him to do that.

Would be really great if we could avoid this

Why? You want to sue the dealership yet you wouldn't want to go to court to obtain complete ownership of the vehicle? Is there a reason? Especially given the fact he could sell the vehicle and get out of a good portion of the debt by doing this, why would you not want to claim total ownership?

and the dealership argues that we "showed intent to buy".

apparently the dealership also had enough evidence to convince the police of this as well. Gee, I wonder what that evidence could have been.

 

[Proserpina]

Gee, I wonder what that evidence could have been.

Call me cynical, but the "Hi, Mr Nice Salesperson! I'd like to buy my new chippie a vehicle! Just don't tell the wifey please and thank you", might've done it.

 

[tranquility]

Perhaps security video?

 

[Zigner]

Perhaps security video?

From many moons ago?