Wow Stealth2,
The only way that I can see this post could be "wasting anyone's time" is if they choose to read it, totally ignore the question or offer an opinion and focus on critiquing how the question was asked.
My question is (and always was) related to perjury in the courts which apparently you believe is "petty stuff". Perhaps you do not like my "pizza scenario" but as I stated....I was just trying to break things down simply. Replace pizza with any material fact....it doesn't matter. The premise is the same. Lying under oath, to a judge, in a courtroom about a material fact of a case - petty stuff, right?
No, I am not going to place every detail of a real word case online, I'm paying a lawyer to handle that. Forgive me for posting a legit question and ask for opinions on a free legal forum online because I was trying to learn a little more on my own. Isn't that what this forum is for? Maybe I don't understand why this forum exists.
I am speaking intelligently, I am taking in peoples opinions, and I am attempting to understand from others. Why should I feel like I am wasting people's time just because I still have questions? Ignore my post and simply don't respond. Your time is so valuable.
I will say that when you *DID* comment on the scenario, you gave me an intelligent thing to consider. The idea of TWO separate "pizzas". I never thought of it that way and adjusted the scenario.
If you would like to comment on the underlying theme of this "committing perjury in open court" please feel free to continue to answer and I value all opinions and thoughts.
Unless I am to understand that lying to a judge or the theoretic scenario is - petty stuff.