court comming up 13th

[acmb05]

I am trying to keep you focused.

Filing to block a relocation is not a contempt hearing.

You are filing about things for which you have 3rd hand knowledge, more of your confusion.

Your Aunt has a right to testify as to her knowledge of the facts, it is not a matter of standing insofar as GPV or other issue, get that out of your head.

She is an excellent witness as to what has been happening during the year mom and child lived with her and obviously you and your cousin don't want her to testify as you feel it would be detramental to your cousins case to have his own mother both provide shelter to mom and grandchild but to also testify. It is the judges decision as whom they will hear, not yours.

That your cousin gave his version as to mom's illness is not relevant especially since he has lived in another state and would not have waivers signed nor first hand knowledge of the facts.

Wow are you confused. The judge was going to do the contempt motion at the same time as the original hearing for the move away.

I am not filling in anything I have been talking to my cousin. I am telling you exactly what happened.

My Aunt has a right to testify but the way she was putting it was she would have a say so in what happens.

I have no idea where you got the idea she would be testifying against her son but she would ot be she was going to testify FOR her son.

I am not goin to go into the illness as the judge knows all about it. He bowls on the same league as the mothers parents and has first hand knowledge of the illness.

Now there has been a kink in the order already as the mother showed up for court 1 1/2 hours late and spoke to the judge in chambers without any lawyers present and judge has now stayed his ruling until another court date can be set.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Already answered. quit asking.

I was responding to the previous post so I didn't see that you eventually answered the question.

SHE SIGNED FOR THE PAPERS FROM THE COURT. IT IS HER SIGNATURE.

Do you know that for a fact? Did you serve the papers to her personally?

Dont you think the judge would look at all of that before making his ruling.

I odn't assume anyting without evidence. Were you there? Did the Judge comment that he compared the signature to existing examples of her signature? Was there anyone there to object or represent mom? Did the judge attempt to contact mom or delay the hearing until later in case she was late? No, the judge simply made a summary judgement in such a way as to allow mom the opportunity to appeal.

And you say I have a comprehension problem.

It is quite obvious.

What are you arguing about anyway the Judge made his ruling this morning. I was not asking for advice on it just an update on what happened in court.

Because your story doesn't ring true.

The mother did not answer the summons either time nor did she bother to show up for court(again she was in Memphis with her internet friend) If she cares so little about her child then she got what was coming to her.

We don't know that mom doesn't have a litigimate reason for not appearing How far away is Memphis from where the hearing was held? You say she doesn't care about her child, the same could be said for you because you didn't even try to get visitation orders in your divorce and that is why you lost track of your daughter.

 

[acmb05]

I am trying to keep you focused.

Filing to block a relocation is not a contempt hearing.

You are filing about things for which you have 3rd hand knowledge, more of your confusion.

Your Aunt has a right to testify as to her knowledge of the facts, it is not a matter of standing insofar as GPV or other issue, get that out of your head.

She is an excellent witness as to what has been happening during the year mom and child lived with her and obviously you and your cousin don't want her to testify as you feel it would be detramental to your cousins case to have his own mother both provide shelter to mom and grandchild but to also testify. It is the judges decision as whom they will hear, not yours.

That your cousin gave his version as to mom's illness is not relevant especially since he has lived in another state and would not have waivers signed nor first hand knowledge of the facts.

You also jump to a lot of conclusions here.

 

[acmb05]

I was responding to the previous post so I didn't see that you eventually answered the question.
Do you know that for a fact? Did you serve the papers to her personally?
I odn't assume anyting without evidence. Were you there? Did the Judge comment that he compared the signature to existing examples of her signature? Was there anyone there to object or represent mom? Did the judge attempt to contact mom or delay the hearing until later in case she was late? No, the judge simply made a summary judgement in such a way as to allow mom the opportunity to appeal.
It is quite obvious.
Because your story doesn't ring true.

We don't know that mom doesn't have a litigimate reason for not appearing How far away is Memphis from where the hearing was held? You say she doesn't care about her child, the same could be said for you because you didn't even try to get visitation orders in your divorce and that is why you lost track of your daughter.

Would you stop with my case already you are like a broken record. My case has absolutely nothing to do with my cousins.

She lives 3 miles from the court house, she has known about this court date for 3 weeks, she decided to go to Memphis yesterday knowing full well what time and where court was.

Btw I have now had contact with my child so you can get off your horse now.