Craziest thing I have seen

[quincy]

Wowsers!

So if I understand correctly, this guy/company contacts judgement holders to assign over their judgment entitlement to him/it, then bills (or sues) them instead for the split he should have sent them after recovery, by slyly wording the ambigous contact/contract. Madness.

is there any way to find out who/how-many else he/this-company sued for fees/collection efforts despite collecting anything?

Any way to find out? Not without publishing real names ... and this should not be done on this forum.

 

[Cagarden]

Still wondering how many others this company has sued for ghost services, though! Surely there has to be other people complaining about the same entity's scam... somewhere? =L

 

[quincy]

Still wondering how many others this company has sued for ghost services, though! Surely there has to be other people complaining about the same entity's scam... somewhere? =L

It's possible.

 

[Zigner]

Still wondering how many others this company has sued for ghost services, though! Surely there has to be other people complaining about the same entity's scam... somewhere? =L

Does it matter to us?