Honey, you're talking to someone with an MA in poli sci...which, in fact, requires classes like "women and politics" and "gender controversies" (even if you're a *little* more interested in international law). I have all kinds of theories about the use of the word "girl," but fact remains that is what she uses. She is used to renting to people fresh out of undergrad, maybe 22 or 23, and on their own for the first time.
What does any of this have to do w/ the price of tea? Poli sci, huh? Try engineering. Which is akin to tons of logic courses (math is pure logic). I stand by my statement.
Yes, her casual relationship with tenants sometimes begets immature and unprofessional behavior. Whatever...so long as everything is working and the rent is reasonable, I'll treat her like I would anyone else I have a business relationship with. Including when she, intentionally or not, tries to create a new obligation for me.
Whatever? You seemingly embrace and foster this relationship, and its casual application, yet then complain when she asks an ordinary (for her) favor of you (to watch the property)? Yeah, mixing and confusing business with personal affairs, and professional with street language begets this kind of "stuff."
Notwithstanding your seeming allowance and perpetuation with this casual relationship, my only issue with it (other than the unprofessional verbiage and sexist (yes...sexist) overtones (post modernistic poli-sci stuff) is her appointment of the tenants as gatekeepers and watchers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?) She cannot assign that duty to tenants (negligence or crimes of others of which the tenants are totally uninvolved with).
Yes. We reap what we sow, and casual relationships (and verbiage) in a professional setting begets just this sort of thing. Surprised? Class is out! I, as the others, would simply ignore the illegal mandate/assignment. And try to re-establish a proper LL/tenant relationship that is not so...casual.