No but they enforce it which makes them guilty by association. They enforce it with a giant smile on their faces.
Traffic enforcement is part of the job. Granted it is a minor part of the job, but is still part of the job. And, if the officers are part of a traffic enforcement unit, they almost always give cites. It is what they are expected to do.
Pretty much everyone knows the fact that the LAPD is ultra corrupt.
The stats just don' bear that baseless allegation out, sorry.
They make movies after movie about it, turn on the radio and hear show after show about it.
Allegations are EASY ... all anyone has to do is make a claim, even if not true. The LAPD now has a system by which officers get negative points for every allegation against them - false or not. So, when it comes time for promotion or transfer, they get denied because they have these allegations. So, what has happened is that many officers have turned into REACTIVE officers as opposed to PRO-active ones.
Allegations are easy. Defending against an allegation is almost impossible as the agency and the officer(s) involved are forbidden by law and policy from refuting most such claims. And when the refutation comes out, the proof is buried. Read about the Rampart scandal, compare the number of indictments and allegations to the end result and you will see what I mean.
I'll be concerned when the day comes that any act of officer malfeasance does NOT make news. And the fact that an incident is repeated over and over again does not mean that there is a culture of corruption or that the agency is "ultra corrupt." But, I am sure that nothing I, or anyone else, will say will convince you otherwise, so all I can do is shrug it off and say that I believe you are wrong.
Google: LAPD corrupt and see what you get.
I get links to news art5icles from old stories, the Rampart scandal, and an assortment of blogs by rather biased folks.
Most people know this to be a fact. Of course a police insider wouldn't have any clue and would think the whole system is perfect.
Never said the system was perfect ... but, as I AM on the inside, I see far more of how it works than you do. I actually KNOW the people involved. And, as a side note, who do you think breaks most allegations of police corruption and malfeasance? Oh yeah, it is other cops!
Great, we are getting somewhere now. So how do I go about getting it corrected? Do I have to plead not guilty?
You appear in court, plead not guilty, and ask if the violation is correctable. if so, you might have ask what is acceptable proof of correction to the court. they do not HAVE to make it correctable, but they can.
The poster above stated from experience that it does involve a point.
That's contrary to the 2009 bail and fee schedule. But, the courts do not assign points, the DMV does. So, looking on the DMV website, it appears that 24250 is, indeed, a one point violation. That's what I get for looking at only one resource.
Obviously he doesn't have to do anything nor have sympathy for my accidental mistake, just goes to show what kind of person he is. Again, everything is so black and white with you people, where is the sympathy? We're all human.
What he did was legal, whether it was something I would have done or not. Ranting about it is fine, but in the end the rant does nothing to change the situation you are in. At this point, you go in and plead not guilty, ask if it is correctable, and if it is you later bring in some proof of correction. What that might be, I can't say off hand - usually it's a sign off on the back of the citation.
if the court says they will not make it correctable, then you will either have to challenge the citation or will have to plead guilty and ask for traffic school. Challenging it could be ... a challenge, as your defense seems to be that it was an accident. That is effectively an admission of guilt. But, you can attend court, hope the officer does not show up, and then move for a dismissal. if he shows up, you will likely be offered a chance to plead guilty before trial and get traffic school.
That was a joke. Next time I'll use a smiley.
We're cops. We don't have a sense of humor.
- Carl