Hi. I am trying to understand the difference between changing the jurisdiction of a court vs. changing the court venue in a Washington family law case. In my concrete example, a family has lived in Washington for a few years, then divorce and custody battle for their minor child happen. Mother and child have moved away to a different state 2 years ago and father has moved to a different county in Washington. Currently, for every court motion the parents have to go to the same court in the same county which handled their divorce and custody battle. Mother likes this because Washington, in particular the judges in that particular court, are very supportive of the mother (she just sends her lawyer for hearings). Father hates it because all judges know him and categorically rule against him (and because he has to drive back to that county for every court hearing, being pro se). Mother knows how good that particular court has been and will vehemently oppose for the case to be transferred to a different court.
I mean if 2 people used to live in Washington and one of them moved to Maine 5 years ago and the other to Hawaii 2 years ago, surely the court cannot expect them to have to travel to Washington every time a motion needs to be filed.
What would be the procedure to either change the court venue to another county in Washington (where no judge has ever met father or mother) or, even better, to New Mexico where mother and child live? Any RCWs I could look up?
Thank you
I mean if 2 people used to live in Washington and one of them moved to Maine 5 years ago and the other to Hawaii 2 years ago, surely the court cannot expect them to have to travel to Washington every time a motion needs to be filed.
What would be the procedure to either change the court venue to another county in Washington (where no judge has ever met father or mother) or, even better, to New Mexico where mother and child live? Any RCWs I could look up?
Thank you
Last edited: