stressedex
Junior Member
Post removed by OP
Last edited:
Are you an attorney licensed to practice in Oklahoma? If not, How can you be sure?Sorry, but your attorney is correct...there is no way around it.
Your attorney, who IS licensed in Oklahoma (presumably), has already given you your answer.Are you an attorney licensed to practice in Oklahoma? If not, How can you be sure?
IF there is a medically necessary reason that a CVS or amnio needs to be done, it MAY be possible to legally establish fiance's paternity prior to birth using some of the genetic material drawn.
If you wanted a divorce, why blame the delay on HIS foot dragging? You could have filed yourself.
A legally licensed attorney gave me incorrect advice once before, which nearly resulted in the loss of about $15,000. Now, it seems that this attorney has done the same. Laziness, perhaps? Last I knew, attorneys were human and capable of error. What's wrong with getting a second opinion?Your attorney, who IS licensed in Oklahoma (presumably), has already given you your answer.
Oh yeah that is probably the smartest move you can make, hire your next door neighbor, and then what happens when his "shortcut" to your problem blows up in your face? you will have to fire him and then move to cuz it certainly wont be a very amicable situation.Fortunately, my neighbor, who is a lawyer, just gave me some free legal advice. I'll be firing my attorney immediately and hiring him since he is aware of the easy way around this issue. Problem solved.
And another lesson is to not pretend you found an attorney who agrees with you, because that never fools anybody.A lesson for some of you- please answer only if you KNOW the answer, please don't waste their time with what you THINK you know.
Fantastic! I'm stealing it! (even with the split infinitive)And another lesson is to not pretend you found an attorney who agrees with you, because that never fools anybody.
By the way, I'm a layperson. Feel free to theoretically sue me.
Dang. And I had actually typed it the other way and looked at it for a minute before I finally went with "to not". I thought it was more precise. Theoretically.split infinitive