Once again proving how you didn't listen to anything I said. Amazing.
once again proving you don't listen to anything.
You would be vilified in the press. You would be made to look like a dolt with no common sense.
so, opening arguments of the defense:
here we have a woman that was fully aware she was hypersensitive to caffeine yet she continually decided to tempt fate and order a cup of coffee. While she will argue that she ordered "decaf" and that she had drank the same drink many times, I want you, the jury to think about this:
if I shot myself one time and survived, would it make sense that I could shoot myself any time I wanted to and expect to survive? Of course not. Just because a person escapes injury one time does not make it so they will always escape injury. I am fully aware that a gunshot could kill me. She is fully aware that the consumption of caffeine could cause her to experience a medical emergency. Here we have a woman that tempted fate and lost. She intentionally consumed a drink she was fully aware contained caffeine with the belief she could not be harmed simply because she got away with it previously. I wonder, how did she realize she was hypersensitive to caffeine. She claims she knows she is so that would mean she has previously experienced enough of a reaction to seek medical attention and be diagnosed. Would you ever consider risking injury if the reaction was severe enough to have sought medical treatment? Would any reasonable person tempt fate in such a way and when injured, argue it wasn't their fault. I think not. That is why we, as defendants, are denying her claim but since we believe this is simply an attempt to milk the system and a frivolous action, are asking for $1.5 million in damages including legal expenses and a claim of defamation.