Robert Donovan
Member
We own a small property, about 1.6 acres, and a significant portion of that is a pond, of which we own somewhere around 90% of. The pond is man made many generations ago for cattle, which have long since gone. However, the damming of the steam has brought an abundance of of wildlife, and for decades has been the home everything from turtles, otter, heron, deer, hawks, fish, and so much more. However, a few months ago we experience a dam failure, and the failure happened at the end of the abutting owners side of the dam. The problem is that we own about 40% of the dam, while the owner of the 10% of the pond, owns about 60% of the dam, and she has stated that she would like to see the area created by the dam to revert back to a natural state.
My question is this. I own 40% of something which served a purpose, to hold back water, and as a result created a pond. Do I have a right to, whether on at my expense, or jointly, to remedy the broken dam, so that I can restore the dam to its original function, an as a result get my pond back from the mud hole it now is.
Thank you
My question is this. I own 40% of something which served a purpose, to hold back water, and as a result created a pond. Do I have a right to, whether on at my expense, or jointly, to remedy the broken dam, so that I can restore the dam to its original function, an as a result get my pond back from the mud hole it now is.
Thank you