Ladynred said:
Sounds to me like a personal choice more than an actual restriction on your mobility to seek better employment. While I can certainly understand that choice where a child is concerned, you cannot point fingers and rail at the laws that are meant to protect the best interests of the child but inconvenience you.
Huh? Did you even read it? Let me copy and past if for you. I'll even bold the important areas.
(1) A child whose parental custody is governed by court order has, for the purposes of this section, a legal residence with each parent. Except as otherwise provided in this section,
a parent of a child whose custody is governed by court order shall not change a legal residence of the child to a location that is more than 100 miles from the child's legal residence at the time of the commencement of the action in which the order is issued.
(2) A parent's change of a child's legal residence is not restricted by subsection
(1) if the other parent consents to, or if the court, after complying with subsection (4), permits, the residence change. This section does not apply if the order governing the child's custody grants sole legal custody to 1 of the child's parents.
(3) This section does not apply if, at the time of the commencement of the action in which the custody order is issued, the child's 2 residences were more than 100 miles apart. This section does not apply if the legal residence change results in the child's 2 legal residences being closer to each other than before the change.
(4) Before permitting a legal residence change otherwise restricted by subsection (1),
the court shall consider each of the following factors, with the child as the primary focus in the court's deliberations:
(a) Whether the legal residence change has the capacity to improve the quality of life for both the child and the relocating parent. When I called the courts regarding this matter, they said the best interest of a child isn't a fatherless child, who has no arrears.
(b) The degree to which each parent has complied with, and utilized his or her time under, a court order governing parenting time with the child, and whether the parent's plan to change the child's legal residence is inspired by that parent's desire to defeat or frustrate the parenting time schedule.
(c) The degree to which the court is satisfied that, if the court permits the legal residence change, it is possible to order a modification of the parenting time schedule and other arrangements governing the child's schedule in a manner that can provide an adequate basis for preserving and fostering the parental relationship between the child and each parent;
and whether each parent is likely to comply with the modification. The mother would never comply.
(d) The extent to which the parent opposing the legal residence change is motivated by a desire to secure a financial advantage with respect to a support obligation. A stated above, my child support is paid up to date.
(e) Domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence was directed against or witnessed by the child.
You honestly think that I didn't look into all this already? Michigan laws are very complicated and getting joint physical custody is impossible, unless both parents agree. Rarely does a father have physical custody in my state... No matter how good the Attorney retained.
Ladynred, obviously you have no children, am I correct? If you knew how hard it was for me to move out to Colorado for 9 months... being away from my child was torture, it was the hardest thing a parent could endure. Honestly, I was relieved when the courts sent me an "order to appear" due to the law "*to decide or enforce a child custody or parenting time matter."
So I can either be:
A) A rat who can't pay his Credit Card bills.
or
B) A deadbeat father who has not contact with his child.
I choose (A). My child goes above and beyond the 7 scandalous CC companies that I am in debt to.
Oh, DC, Don't think that I am not looking for another $6500 salary job. Trust me, I am! In fact, I applied to one a month before they closed shop to go out of the country to obtain cheaper wages.