I don't understand the question and have no idea what "pump and dump" means. Nor is it clear what the purpose was of the "acquaintance" "stating that [your friend] basically controls, owns and manages [some] company" or why that's resulted in your friend incurring $10,000+ in attorney fees for a couple of demand letters.
Thank you for the response.
"Pump and dump" in this context (like most other) means they list a penny stock in OTC markets. Then, they make fake press releases to pump up the stock, thereafter liquidating their own position to the public at inflated prices.
"Fraudulent use of a name" is not a recognized cause of action, and it's not clear how your friends reputation was damaged as a result of an SEC filing that virtually no one likely read -- especially since your friend apparently isn't a U.S. resident.
If anyone looks up his name in the future, it will be associated with this obvious scam.
Considering they made fake PR releases to inflate the stock, it was definitely read by people in the public market. There's tons of discussion about the stock in investing forums as well.
Worse yet, he already had a bank account application denied. While the bank wouldn't disclose why, my hunch is that this association with a public company might have been the reason.
Basically, they pumped the stock, liquidated their position, and pinned the entire thing on my friend who was oblivious to use of his name.
Also, how is it that the "John Smith" mentioned in the filings is clearly identifiable as your friend, as opposed to the dozens or hundreds or thousands of people who have the same name.
There's no one else with this name. Trust me.
Further, the filings listed a random address in the same country where my friend is based for any notices. The address did not belong to him.
Plus they sent him backdated documents to sign, so he was clearly the intended target. This is beyond a doubt.
Why would your friend hire a non-U.S. attorney for this? And why is this non-U.S. lawyer making recommendations about a U.S. legal matter?
We aren't based in the U.S., we didn't have any direction.
You don't. This has nothing to do with you.
I understand, I'm just trying to help him find the best course of action.
It's a huge jump from using his name in an SEC filing to "fraud."
If you read the specifics above, do you still think so?