Despite law training, some people are just inherently better at arguing and speaking eloquently and being persuasive. Also some are just inherently more intelligent and see things differently and more clearly than others and see other options. That is what makes a great attorney, or at least trial attorney. Even if the client seems to have obviously broken the law, a good attorney can make an extremely good argument that they did not in fact break the law. That's what makes a good attorney. They can find loopholes, be persuasive etc. Law training means very little in that respect. Despite the fact that attorneys have to get so many years of "education", there is nothing special or particularly skilled about what they do, unless they have the oratorial skills that are just inherent in some people. I've represented myself in court in family law. It blows me away that family law attorneys charge people so much to do what they do. I figured it out on my own in less than a week, filed the paperwork, took my arguments to court and won. While I only represented myself in court once, accomplished a lot through many different documents filed on many occasions without having to go to court. Many attorneys are simply parasites who don't actually do much of anything other than have paralegals / junior attorneys fill out paperwork and then charge $200 an hour for their "skills."
At any rate, she was pulled over because the cops in the particular town she was pulled over in harass pretty much anyone driving at late hours of the night. They're notorious for being overzealous traffic monitors.
It doesn't seem to me like the public defender will actually make any kind of argument that will do anything or even be able to spend the time to deal with the case properly in the first place. I'm trying to find out what kind of penalties to expect in Arkansas for her situation if found guilty.