• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Grr..He's gone overseas

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Noelle_71

Member
rmet4nzkx said:
I did read it, don't put words in my mouth or infer an absolute, there is a big difference between envoking the SSCRA and it's subsequent denial. And it's possible that the money she is attempting to get isn't subject to the order.

I am not trying to "get" his money.
I have been divorced since 1994. In all that time, I have only ever asked for him to take care of his kids. I struggle, I'm a single mom and I do my best, but it is not enough. He refuses to help out and is, in my opinion, a selfish childish you-know-what.
I don't care if he gets combat pay, I don't care if he win's the lottery. I want my kids child support to be at the level it should be.
I started this process before I even knew he was getting sent overseas. I'm not trying to cheat anyone out of anything. And in my opinion, if he's so much of a loser as to try to block his childrens support, then he's not a man anyway.
I will let this board know what happens as it might help someone else.
Regardless, the SSCRA was NOT written to protect people from paying their child support.
 


Noelle_71

Member
rmet4nzkx said:
So he wasn't eager, he was visiting his girlfriend instead, not deployed and therefore SSCRA wasn't an issue. I never said SSCRA is automatic, that is why I have continually stated IF he envoked SSCRA, he may not.
He IS deployed to to Qatar, a war zone, not a resort, why would you want a piece of his combat pay as a part your child support modification, see you are playing with words. Just be careful what you do or you may bite of your nose to spite your face.

Well...we were both assigned to Ramstein, which was a support base for the first gulf conflict and therefore, I suppose he could have done so if he wished, or I could have done so if I wished at that time. And yes, Qatar is a resort, it's just called a war zone for political purposes. I would think that a Judge would probably see it as such in a case like this. But I'm going to drop this, I will let everyone know what happens.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top