Gun bans within 1,000 feet of school grounds

[Silverplum]

Yet you voluntarily waste your time continuing to make useless comments when someone asks a question which relates to the subject of this board. That's what I'd expect from a government official, not a volunteer.

What do you not understand about the concept of it being MY time to do as I please?

 

[Torellian]

And at least three posters told you that, in order to meaningfully and intelligently discuss said law, you'd have to provide the exact cite to said law.

provide the cite.

The word is "site", not "cite".

 

[Torellian]

What do you not understand about the concept of it being MY time to do as I please?

The same as your misunderstanding of me being able to ask a question on a site like this. But if it pleases you to give a hard time to people asking questions about legal matters on a legal forum, then I hope you are pleased with what you're doing today.

 

[randolph76]

The word is "site", not "cite".

No, it's cite. Reading is fundamental

 

[Torellian]

No, it's cite. Reading is fundamental

You're correct! After all, it is short for "webcite". Correct spelling iz not taught in skool anymore!

 

[xylene]

You're correct! After all, it is short for "webcite". Correct spelling iz not taught in skool anymore!

Actually the word is correct, in the context being used it is cite, as in citation. Like in a bibliography.

 

[Silverplum]

The word is "site", not "cite".

"Site" = website

"Cite" = legal citation

 

[Silverplum]

The same as your misunderstanding of me being able to ask a question on a site like this. But if it pleases you to give a hard time to people asking questions about legal matters on a legal forum, then I hope you are pleased with what you're doing today.

Sure, because I refused to make a fool of myself "discussing" a "law" that I have never read.

I'm totally proud of myself.

 

[Proserpina]

"Site" = website

"Cite" = legal citation

Hence in this context "cite" would be correct

 

[swalsh411]

If they are referring to the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act, that does not apply to persons lawfully carrying firearms in accordance with the laws of their state.

If they are referring to some Wisconsin law then I am not familiar with that.

 

[justalayman]

I don't think he's supposed to be within 300 feet of a school...or a Chuck E. Cheese.

have you seen the size of that mouse? I think not only should you be allowed to carry but it should be mandatory. If that thing ever gets loose and procreates, everybody is in for some serious trouble.

 

[Torellian]

And at least three posters told you that, in order to meaningfully and intelligently discuss said law, you'd have to provide the exact cite to said law.

So provide the cite.

QUOTE]

Actually, the context has to do with a website that was being referenced. Otherwise, how am I supposed to "provide the exact site to said law"?

 

[Zigner]

Actually, the context has to do with a website that was being referenced. Otherwise, how am I supposed to "provide the exact site to said law"?

You're wrong. You were asked to provide the cite, as in citation. Not site, as in website.

 

[BOR]

If they are referring to the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act, that does not apply to persons lawfully carrying firearms in accordance with the laws of their state.

That law was declared Unconstitutional, so it does not apply at all.

 

[Torellian]

You're wrong. You were asked to provide the cite, as in citation. Not site, as in website.

Read the quote, "And at least three posters told you that, in order to meaningfully and intelligently discuss said law, you'd have to provide the exact cite to said law.

So provide the cite."

How am I supposed to provide that? It obviously means website. The other way doesn't even make sense!