well no, I have no references to what I posted, I posted under the assumption i have always gotten here and elsewhere, that once child support is given to the CP they can do what they want with it.
if a CP and NCP are doing what they are supposed to, say for example, NCP pays 500 a month in support, and the CP makes double or more(we hope lol) that amount and decides to bank 500 a month in some form of investment, how can the NCP possibly prove it was "thier" money in the bank?
that argument is one I have never "gotten" here or elsewhere, when a parent says "she spends all the support on manicures" how do they really know that?
If a CP spends 50 bucks of 'thier" money on shoes for the kids, and then when the support check arrives spends 50 bucks on shoes for herself, why are we supposed to care where the money came from?
As far as keeping the kids at a level they were at when the parents were together, my husband says in our case that would only work if the ex continued to max out credit cards for stuff, and cash advances....just thought I would throw that in as I think of that comment everytime someone says kids deserve to stay at the finacial level they were at at the time of marriage. I just don't think it is really possible, though they think the guidelines can realistically do it.
Personally I would love it if my husbands ex found a rich guy dumb enough to support her spending habits so she could bank my husbands support for the kids, at least they might actually get something worthwhile and lasting later in life from it...oh well blah blah blah I ramble...
I too, wonder about the LEGAL aspects of trust funds for child support!