• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Hearing loss from work accident

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

dcarlson29

New member
In mid-July I was working at Walmart building bicycles. As I was inflating a kids bike tire, the tube must have pinched and the tire popped, causing me to lose some hearing in my right ear. I was unaware that this kind of thing could happen as it was not mentioned at all in the training I received. I reported the incident and the company that handles claims for Walmart has paid the medical bill for the 2 doctor visits I had. The specialist said both ears are still hearing in the normal range but the right is slightly weaker at certain frequencies. The doctors said there is nothing else they can do right now except have another hearing exam in 6 months. They said that the hearing discrepancy and pressure/fullness experienced in my right ear could go away with time but is likely to be permanent. I am guessing the answer is no, but since I may need hearing aids sooner than the average person am I entitled to any compensation beyond getting my medical bills paid for?
 


cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
Workers comp law vary by state. You are quite likely correct that the answer is no, but without knowing what state you are in it's impossible to say for certain.
 

adjusterjack

Senior Member
I may need hearing aids sooner than the average person am I entitled to any compensation beyond getting my medical bills paid for?
You may be able to get your hearing aid paid for by WC but a minor partial hearing loss is not going to disable you from working for a living so the cost of the hearing tests and possibly hearing aids is all you'll get.

I suggest you get a copy of your audiogram and read up on how to interpret it:

http://www.chimehealth.co.uk/web/data/audiogram-hearing-loss-examples-2.pdf

Then you can monitor your hearing loss over time.
 

PayrollHRGuy

Senior Member
Here is the WI work comp law on the issue. It seems to me that NO payment will be allowed because there is no total deafness in either ear.

102.555  Occupational deafness; definitions.
(1)  In this section:
(a) “Noise" means sound capable of producing occupational deafness.
(b) “Noisy employment" means employment in the performance of which an employee is subjected to noise.
(c) “Occupational deafness" means permanent partial or permanent total loss of hearing of one or both ears due to prolonged exposure to noise in employment.
(2) No benefits shall be payable for temporary total or temporary partial disability under this chapter for loss of hearing due to prolonged exposure to noise.
(3) An employee who because of occupational deafness is transferred by his or her employer to other noisy employment and thereby sustains actual wage loss shall be compensated at the rate provided in s. 102.43 (2), not exceeding $7,000 in the aggregate from all employers. “Time of injury", “occurrence of injury", and “date of injury" in such case mean the date of wage loss.
(4) Subject to the limitations provided in this section, there shall be payable for total occupational deafness of one ear, 36 weeks of compensation; for total occupational deafness of both ears, 216 weeks of compensation; and for partial occupational deafness, compensation shall bear such relation to that named in this section as disabilities bear to the maximum disabilities provided in this section. In cases covered by this subsection, “time of injury", “occurrence of injury", or “date of injury" shall, at the option of the employee, be the date of occurrence of any of the following events to an employee:
(a) Transfer to nonnoisy employment by an employer whose employment has caused occupational deafness;
(b) The last day actually worked before retiring, regardless of vacation pay or time, sick leave or any other benefit to which the employee is entitled;
(c) Termination of the employer-employee relationship; or
(d) Layoff, provided the layoff is complete and continuous for 6 months.
(5) No claim under sub. (4) may be filed until 7 consecutive days of removal from noisy employment after the time of injury except that under sub. (4) (d) the 7 consecutive days' period may commence within the last 2 months of layoff.
(6) The limitation provisions in this chapter shall control claims arising under this section. Such provisions shall run from the first date upon which claim may be filed, or from the date of subsequent death, provided that no claim shall accrue to any dependent unless an award has been issued or hearing tests have been conducted by a competent medical specialist after the employee has been removed from the noisy environment for a period of 2 months.
(7) No payment shall be made to an employee under this section unless the employee shall have worked in noisy employment for a total period of at least 90 days for the employer from whom the employee claims compensation.
(8) An employer is liable for the entire occupational deafness to which his or her employment has contributed; but if previous deafness is established by a hearing test or other competent evidence, whether or not the employee was exposed to noise within the 2 months preceding such test, the employer is not liable for previous loss so established nor is the employer liable for any loss for which compensation has previously been paid or awarded.
(9) Any amount paid to an employee under this section by any employer shall be credited against compensation payable by any employer to such employee for occupational deafness under subs. (3) and (4). No employee shall in the aggregate receive greater compensation from any or all employers for occupational deafness than that provided in this section for total occupational deafness.
(10) No compensation may be paid for tinnitus unless a hearing test demonstrates a compensable hearing loss other than tinnitus. For injuries occurring on or after January 1, 1992, no compensation may be paid for tinnitus.
(11) Compensation under s. 102.66 for permanent partial disability due to occupational deafness may be paid only if the loss of hearing exceeds 20 percent of binaural hearing loss.
(12) 
(a) An employer, the department, or the division is not liable for the expense of any examination or test for hearing loss, any evaluation of such an exam or test, any medical treatment for improving or restoring hearing, or any hearing aid to relieve the effect of hearing loss unless it is determined that compensation for occupational deafness is payable under sub. (3), (4), or (11).
102.555(12)(b)(b) For a case of occupational deafness in which the date of injury is on or after April 1, 2008, this subsection applies beginning on that date. Notwithstanding ss. 102.03 (4) and 102.17 (4), for a case of occupational deafness in which the date of injury is before April 1, 2008, this subsection applies beginning on January 1, 2012.
 

quincy

Senior Member
The hearing loss is not "occupational deafness" which is deafness due to prolonged exposure to noise in employment.

The loss of hearing was due to an accident (tire explosion) that occurred during the course of dcarlson's employment.
 

HRZ

Senior Member
IT might be prudent to review your fact pattern with a lawyer who specializes in occupation hearing issues , just in case your hearing takes a turn for the worse , and you need to preserve some options ...odds favor your recovery and I sure hope it works that way.....just do a bit of legal foundation checks

As others note this is brought on by an accident, not prolonged working in a noisy environment .
 

quincy

Senior Member
IT might be prudent to review your fact pattern with a lawyer who specializes in occupation hearing issues , just in case your hearing takes a turn for the worse , and you need to preserve some options ...odds favor your recovery and I sure hope it works that way.....just do a bit of legal foundation checks

As others note this is brought on by an accident, not prolonged working in a noisy environment .
What happened to dcarlson is not an example of "occupational" hearing loss. It is an example of "accidental" hearing loss.

Here is a link to Wisconsin's workers compensation standards on hearing loss in the workplace and how it is measured for purposes of workers compensation claims, from Wisconsin's Department of Workforce Development:

DWD 80.25: http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/admin_code/dwd/080_081/80/25

While a personal review of the "fact pattern" can be important, there will not be another ear examination for six months. This follow-up examination can better determine if there is compensable partial hearing loss attributable to the accident.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top