MeMyselfandIinMissouri
Active Member
I know exactly why she's taking me to court, I'm not a moron. I also know that once she filed the eviction notice, all communication would go through her attorney, which I did. The communication with the landlord was cut off inexplicably by the landlord PRIOR to the eviction filing. I'm not stupid here. You all are just trying to get additional information out of me to play judge and jury.Look, you might not want to go into the whole story, but...
It matters. Something triggered this action on the LL's part. LLs generally don't refuse rent unless they have a good reason, a legal reason. Like, they're trying to evict you for some reason.
Once the LL has notified you that they are pursuing some sort of legal action against you, and that all further communications with you will be through their lawyer, then the LL is doing nothing wrong by refusing to communicate with you directly. Your "proof" that the LL "cut off all communications" with you, shows nothing important, legally.
If the basis for the LL's legal action against you has a sound legal basis, then setting aside a default judgement isn't going to buy you much of anything.
So yes, the bare facts of the story -at least, why the LL was taking you to court, are relevant.
I know my situation, and don't intend to explain it here. I will explain it to the judge assigned to the case and let HIM make a decision based on what I present to him.