how seriously....

[round 1]

When you post on a public board, you don't get to dictate who responds or how.

That's true but I don't appreciate the negativity thrown my way. No one here went though exactly what I did. I'm sure if one did there would be a bit more sympathy n less bull****

 

[cbg]

Tough cookies.

 

[Isis1]

Tough cookies.

Hmmm cookies....

 

[Willlyjo]

Well I don't have a case number as of yet..like I said I just signed today but yeah I will send it to you and only you because you have been the only positive one here. Opinions and personal opinions are totally different. I don't appreciate the negativity and smart ass answers. I gave up a lot when I quit my job because of this situation. Save the negativity for people who care about your personal opinion

Bless you round1! I knew that my positive feedbacks are felt by the Ops that I respond to. You're right there is a lot of negativity in this forum! Lot of arrogant 'advice givers' who are more into stroking each others ego and trying to get a laugh.

But...as I have said before to like 4 members of this forum in particular, everything speaks for itself--the Op can see what is written and decide who is wrong or right or negative or positive. Good luck to you!

 

[Willlyjo]

Maybe you should read the Op's Posts

One more time Willyjo, read the OP's posts before you start dispensing advice.

OP. ignore Willyjo's advice here, it's not based on anything in this thread and is therefore useless.

Sorry but I guess your advice to the Op to ignore my advice went in one ear and out the other. Maybe you should listen more to what the Op says about people like you before you go and target me with your incoherent, ambiguous, senseless and hard to understand claims.

 

[>Charlotte<]

Great, willjo! Looks like you've found yourself a new BFF! Gosh, Round 1, you should probably tell the rest of us to just kiss off and let willyjo tell you what to do. Be sure and listen to him very carefully and follow his instructions to the letter. Of course, the vast majority of the time he has absolutely no clue what he's talking about, but he's just so darned PLEASANT. That oughta get you somewhere, at least!

Best of luck to ya!

 

[Willlyjo]

Great, willjo! Looks like you've found yourself a new BFF! Gosh, Round 1, you should probably tell the rest of us to just kiss off and let willyjo tell you what to do. Be sure and listen to him very carefully and follow his instructions to the letter. Of course, the vast majority of the time he has absolutely no clue what he's talking about, but he's just so darned PLEASANT. That oughta get you somewhere, at least!

Best of luck to ya!

Jealous that the Op put you in your place? Because you are just as rude and arrogant as the others are.

What is your purpose to come into this thread. It surely isn't to give advice like you're suppose to do.

My demeanor in this forum while giving reasonable advice based on knowledge and experience is always the same--pleasant.

That is until an arrogant and ignorant person like you comes and interferes with a thread that shoud flow in a cohesive manner.

If you have any intelligence at all (and your post doesn't show it), you could see how ridiculous your statement that the vast majority of time, I don't have a clue as to what I'm talking about, is!! You better take a course in Reading Comprehension and then read my posts before you target me with such outlandish, ambiguous and incomprehensible unfounded and unproven claims.

Your attack shows who you are as a person and round1 as well as other Ops who may be viewing this thread can easily see the ignorance and nonsense that your post shows.

Finally, this thread concerns California Labor Law of which I am qualified enough to give advice in a reasonably proficient manner. I don't believe you are even qualified enough to be a part of this thread. If your only purpose is to attack me then get lost. Hopefully, those who run this forum will start penalizing you and those like you who get their jollies stroking each other's ego and attacking those like me who are giving good advice here.

 

[eerelations]

Hey Willlyjo, if you're so smart, how come you haven't been able to respond to my request that you show me the spelling mistakes that you screamed at me about? (And hey - if you're so "pleasant" why did you scream at me about spelling mistakes that I evidently didn't actually make?)

 

[Willlyjo]

One more time Willyjo, read the OP's posts before you start dispensing advice.

OP. ignore Willyjo's advice here, it's not based on anything in this thread and is therefore useless.

Okay eerelations, one more time (only for you). You mispelled Willlyjo. I specifically pointed out another mispelling in another post as well--you can probably trace it down.

Also, really I am a pleasant person but I haven't found too many opportunities to be pleasant to you, Cyjeff, Pattyx, Cbg and others in this forum. Please, oh please give me that opporutunity!!

Personally, we all make rare to occassional mistakes in spelling and minor misinterpretations which may not even change the gist of a post. Normally I overlook them if in fact the misinterpretation doesn't change the actual meaning of content within a post. I also clearly understand what the occassional mispelled word actually is or means so I don't chastise...unless of course, I have to defend myself and respond which as you have noticed during my entire relationship within this forum, I've had to do quite frequently.

 

[Willlyjo]

This it NOT evidence. It is allegations.

What you have are several e-mails in which YOU CLAIM that there are problems. You have not mentioned any admission from the company that there are problems. You have provided nothing that proves that the discrimination was occuring.

Even if HR received your complaint and investigated it, they are under no obligation to reveal to you the results of their investigation or any actions taken as a result of their investigation.

I respectfully disagree with you Random Guy. One of the main purposes of an investigation by HR is to show the employee that filed a complaint that they will not allow discrimination, sexual harrassment, etc...in the workplace.

What purpose would an HR investigate and not make known the results of such investigation. In California, an employer is held to the highest expectation to investigate any complaints an employee makes in regard to Discrimination and let that person know the results of such investigation. From there, the employee is either satisfied with the result or he can further the matter by contacting EEOC.

It is true, HR is under no obligation to reveal the results of their investigation but wouldn't that be counterproductive or even expensive?

 

[Willlyjo]

Well I don't have a case number as of yet..like I said I just signed today but yeah I will send it to you and only you because you have been the only positive one here. Opinions and personal opinions are totally different. I don't appreciate the negativity and smart ass answers. I gave up a lot when I quit my job because of this situation. Save the negativity for people who care about your personal opinion

It is a little late in this thread (hope you are still around checking it out), but it seems like you should have filed a Continuous Trauma Workers Comp. Case regarding stress from your harrassment on the job.

That would compliment any Wrongful Termination for being forced to quit due to "Constructive Discharge". If you haven't looked into this, please do because the Pysche can help you come to terms with, what I'm sure are physical manifestations due to serious emotional distress.

 

[Some Random Guy]

[in response to my comment on allegations versus evidence]I respectfully disagree with you Random Guy. One of the main purposes of an investigation by HR is to show the employee that filed a complaint that they will not allow discrimination, sexual harrassment, etc...in the workplace.

You completely missed the point. When the poster was asked about his EVIDENCE of harassment, he told us that his EVIDENCE was the fact that he filed a complaint. If that was his only evidence, then he wouldn't go very far in his case. The poster has since informed us of other evidence, so its a moot point.

In California, an employer is held to the highest expectation to investigate any complaints an employee makes in regard to Discrimination and let that person know the results of such investigation.

It is true, HR is under no obligation to reveal the results of their investigation but wouldn't that be counterproductive or even expensive?

Which one of your two statements is incorrect? Is HR required to tell you the results of their investigation in California? Do tell.